Senate Republicans just advanced Trump's nominee to head up Social Security.
He'll rubber-stamp Trump and Musk's attack on the program — slashing services and threatening Americans' benefits.
For every single American who counts on Social Security, I voted NO.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 831
Yes26%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 73 sponsored · 305 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Trump wants to spend trillions on a "Golden Dome" missile defense shield — and Musk's SpaceX “just so happens” to be the frontrunner for the contracts.
I led 40+ members of Congress in demanding the Defense Department Inspector General review Musk's influence on the process:
Our country is in a housing crisis and President Trump's tariff chaos is making it worse. Homebuilders expect his tariffs to raise the cost of building a new home by as much as $10,000.
We’re sending a clear message: America can’t afford Trump’s tariffs.
A shady fund backed by a foreign government just announced a $2 billion deal using Trump stablecoins.
The Senate is gearing up to pass stablecoin legislation that will make it easier for Trump's family to line their own pockets.
This is corruption. No senator should support it.
Pete Hegseth shows real leadership by passing the blame to Mike Waltz.
Was it Waltz who set up Signal on Hegseth's office computer and added his wife, brother, and lawyer in a war plan group chat?
Amazon had plans to show customers how much Trump tariffs are raising prices.
Then Bezos got on the phone with Trump and reversed course.
What happened in that call? I'm pressing for answers.
Trump on Day One: Your costs will be lower immediately.
Trump on Day 100: Your kids will now have fewer toys and also you're going to pay higher prices.
In his first 100 days, Donald Trump has done next to nothing but raise costs for American families.
The Trump administration has started rounding up people with no criminal record, moving them so even their families and lawyers have no idea where they are, and deporting them even after a court has said not to.
I'm fighting back.
Trump promised lower costs. Instead? Higher prices, layoffs, and a shrinking economy.
In 100 days, the President broke the strong economy he inherited.
I lay it all out here: senatebankingdemocrats.substack.com/p/how-donald...
Donald Trump wants to pretend that he’s succeeded in bringing grocery prices down like he promised. But new data today shows he’s shrinking the economy and raising the cost of your groceries—all in under 100 days.
It’s only been 100 days, but Donald Trump already managed to shrink the economy and spark widespread fears of recession.
Today, I’m reading into the congressional record 100 reports of corruption from Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
The Trump admin is trying to gut the workforce at the CFPB which protects Americans from getting scammed and ripped off.
Congress created the CFPB and must defend it.
In the Senate, I'm working to stop Trump's assault on American consumers.
The Department of Education helps students afford college by providing financial aid, like Pell Grants. Now, Donald Trump is attacking the department.
So I asked: How have you benefited from financial aid for college?
The Trump Administration is trying to destroy the little agency that's put $21 billion back in the pockets of Americans who have been ripped off by big banks and giant corporations.
But Congress created the CFPB, and we’re fighting back.
Republicans in Congress want to make it more expensive for kids from working-class families to go to college and easier for schools to scam student loan borrowers — all to pay for tax handouts for the wealthiest Americans.
That's the GOP agenda: billionaires win, families lose.
Donald Trump and co-president Elon Musk are making backdoor cuts to the Social Security benefits you’ve paid into your entire working life.
I’m fighting back.
Republicans in Congress are saying "get lost" to millions of people who are counting on Medicaid to cover the medicine that treats their cancer, the hip replacement they need to walk, and the inhaler to help their kid breathe.
And for what? To pay for tax cuts for the rich.
This year, Congress will decide whether billionaire corporations will pay their fair share.
Every senator needs to show the American people what side they stand on—the side of working people or the side of Trump's billionaire friends.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History831 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
831 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17