H. Con. Res. 111 (110th)Bill Overview

Honor Lionel Hampton for Contributions to American Music

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|Arts, Culture, ReligionCommemorations
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 16, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Healthy Families and Communities.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congress's view that Lionel Hampton should be honored for his contributions to American music and his work as an ambassador of goodwill and democracy. It is a nonbinding statement and does not create legal rights, change federal law, or require the President's approval. Its practical effect is to officially recognize Hampton's achievements and encourage public recognition.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are agreed to by both the House and the Senate but are not presented to the President and do not have the force of law. They are typically used for expressions of opinion or for internal congressional matters.

This concurrent resolution expresses the sense of Congress that Lionel Hampton should be honored for his contributions to American music and as an ambassador of goodwill and democracy.

It recites his achievements, including pioneering the vibraphone in jazz, breaking racial barriers with Benny Goodman, performances worldwide, community work in Harlem, and honors received during his life.

Passage90/100

Symbolic, narrow, non-controversial concurrent resolution historically has high chance of adoption by both chambers.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states the purpose and supporting facts and limits itself to an expression of the sense of Congress without attempting to create obligations or allocate resources.

Contention8/100

Liberal emphasizes civil‑rights and community‑investment symbolism

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Schools · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises national visibility for Lionel Hampton's musical and civil‑rights contributions.
  • SchoolsMay encourage museums, schools, and cultural programs to develop Hampton‑focused exhibits or curricula.
  • Local governmentsCould modestly boost local cultural tourism and short‑term event-related jobs around commemorations.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes no budgetary or legal changes, so it does not address concrete policy needs.
  • Potential burdenMay be criticized as symbolic congressional activity that diverts attention from substantive legislation.
  • Federal agenciesProvides no guaranteed federal funding or support for affordable housing or cultural programs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes civil‑rights and community‑investment symbolism
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The resolution recognizes a Black jazz pioneer, celebrates cultural achievement, and notes community service and civil‑rights–era integration.

It aligns with priorities of honoring marginalized contributions and cultural diplomacy.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but mildly practical.

Views the resolution as a noncontroversial ceremonial honor for an important cultural figure, while noting legislative time and priority tradeoffs.

Support is likely if it requires no new spending or regulatory changes.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Likely supportive.

Sees value in honoring a prominent American musician and cultural ambassador.

May appreciate mentions of patriotism and nonpartisan recognition, though might prefer legislative focus on core policy issues.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Symbolic, narrow, non-controversial concurrent resolution historically has high chance of adoption by both chambers.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • House calendar placement and floor time
  • Senate scheduling or individual senator holds
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes civil‑rights and community‑investment symbolism

Symbolic, narrow, non-controversial concurrent resolution historically has high chance of adoption by both chambers.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states the purpose and supporting facts and limits itself to an expression of the sense of Congress without…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis