H. Con. Res. 122 (110th)Bill Overview

Support America Recycles Day and Promote Recycling

Concurrent ResolutionCommemorations|CommemorationsEnvironmental Protection
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 20, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses Congress's support for America Recycles Day and encourages Americans to recycle and buy products made from recycled materials. It summarizes facts about recycling, highlights benefits, and urges increased participation. It does not create binding law or require action; it is a formal statement intended to raise awareness.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be approved by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not have the force of law.

This concurrent resolution expresses Congress’s support for the goal and mission of America Recycles Day and encourages Americans to promote recycling and buy recycled-content products.

It recounts historical and statistical context about municipal solid waste and lists environmental, economic, and social benefits of recycling without creating new law or funding.

Passage90/100

Content is symbolic, nonbinding, low-cost and broadly supported; such resolutions typically clear both chambers. Note: concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward symbolic/congratulatory concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and rationale while intentionally avoiding binding mechanisms, fiscal commitments, or statutory changes.

Contention12/100

Liberal wants stronger, funded federal action and measurable targets

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedConsumers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitElevates public awareness about recycling and recycled-content product purchases.
  • Potential benefitCould modestly increase recycling participation if paired with effective outreach programs.
  • Potential benefitMay support development of secondary markets for recovered materials, expanding green manufacturing demand.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenSymbolic resolution imposes no regulatory or funding requirements, limiting concrete effects.
  • ConsumersMay be criticized as shifting responsibility onto consumers instead of producers or manufacturers.
  • Potential burdenEffectiveness depends on implementation; without funding, behavior change and infrastructure remain uncertain.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal wants stronger, funded federal action and measurable targets
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive; sees the resolution as a useful public-awareness tool that aligns with environmental and social goals.

May view it as a modest step but insufficient without stronger federal policy and funding for recycling infrastructure.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Generally favorable because it is nonbinding and encourages low-cost public engagement.

Wants clearer metrics, cost information, and coordination with state and local programs to ensure practical outcomes.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Cautiously supportive of voluntary recycling promotion but skeptical of federal advocacy.

Views the resolution as largely symbolic and prefers emphasis on local control and private-sector solutions rather than new federal initiatives.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Content is symbolic, nonbinding, low-cost and broadly supported; such resolutions typically clear both chambers. Note: concurrent resolutions do not become statutory law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate floor scheduling or procedural holds
  • Any last-minute objections or holds by individual senators
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal wants stronger, funded federal action and measurable targets

Content is symbolic, nonbinding, low-cost and broadly supported; such resolutions typically clear both chambers. Note: concurrent resolutio…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward symbolic/congratulatory concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and rationale while intentionally avoiding binding mechanisms, fisc…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis