H. Con. Res. 67 (110th)Bill Overview

Set Conditional Adjournment and Recess Dates for Congress

Concurrent ResolutionCongress|CongressCongressional sessions
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 16, 2007
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution sets specific, conditional adjournment and recess dates for both the House and the Senate. It tells the House to stand adjourned until a set time if it adjourns on certain days, and it tells the Senate it may recess or adjourn on certain days until a set return date or time designated by the Senate Majority Leader. It also authorizes the Speaker and the Senate Majority Leader, after consulting the party minority leaders, to call members back earlier if the public interest requires.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions must be agreed to by both the House and the Senate and are not sent to the President; they do not create law but set internal congressional matters like schedules.

This concurrent resolution sets specific conditional adjournment and recess dates for the House and Senate in February 2007, and authorizes the Speaker and Senate Majority Leader (or their designees), after consulting the respective Minority Leaders, to notify Members to reassemble if the public interest warrants.

Passage5/100

Very likely to be adopted as a concurrent resolution; however, concurrent resolutions do not become laws signed by the President.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-specified procedural adjournment resolution that clearly sets conditional adjournment/recess dates and names responsible officials for reconvening.

Contention10/100

Views differ on recall authority: emergency readiness vs. potential partisan use

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides scheduled adjournment and recess dates, giving members predictable out-of-session interval.
  • Potential benefitAllows House and Senate leaders to recall members if public interest warrants, enabling rapid response to emergencies.
  • Potential benefitReduces near-term operational costs by shortening session days and consolidating travel schedules.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenConcentrates recall authority in majority leaders, potentially centralizing control over when Congress reconvenes.
  • Potential burdenLimits opportunities for regular floor oversight during the adjournment period, possibly delaying legislative oversight.
  • Potential burdenMay reduce transparency about reassembly decisions if consultations and notifications occur informally.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Views differ on recall authority: emergency readiness vs. potential partisan use
Progressive90%

Likely supportive; views the resolution as a routine, responsible scheduling tool that preserves Congress's ability to respond to emergencies.

Appreciates the explicit requirement to consult minority leaders before calling members back.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Treats the resolution as routine, pragmatic congressional housekeeping.

Sees the minority consultation clause as a prudent check, but notes the language is high-level and leaves some operational details unspecified.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Generally indifferent-to-cautious support because the measure is procedural and temporary.

Some worry about concentrating recall authority in majority leaders, though required consultation with minority leaders mitigates that concern.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Very likely to be adopted as a concurrent resolution; however, concurrent resolutions do not become laws signed by the President.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether leaders will invoke the reassembly authority
  • Possible objections or holds in either chamber
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Views differ on recall authority: emergency readiness vs. potential partisan use

Very likely to be adopted as a concurrent resolution; however, concurrent resolutions do not become laws signed by the President.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-specified procedural adjournment resolution that clearly sets conditional adjournment/recess dates and names responsible officials for reconvening.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis