- Federal agenciesAffirms that only U.S. citizens may vote in federal elections, supporters say this preserves electoral integrity.
- Federal agenciesCreates a uniform citizenship eligibility rule for federal contests, reducing inter-state variation.
- Federal agenciesAuthorizes Congress to set or alter federal enrollment standards and enforcement mechanisms where necessary.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to ensure that only citizens are eligible to vote in Federal elections.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This joint resolution proposes a Constitutional amendment to make U.S. citizenship a requirement to vote in any federal election, including primaries and elections for President, Vice President, electors, Senators, and Representatives.
It directs state legislatures to prescribe appropriate enforcing legislation, allows Congress to make or alter such regulations, and grants Congress enforcement power over the District of Columbia.
Constitutional amendments are rare; this proposal is ideologically charged and would need unusually wide, bipartisan and interstate support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and concise constitutional amendment that establishes a new substantive rule (citizen-only voting in federal elections) and delegates enforcement authority to states and Congress. It succeeds at articulating the change and assigning responsibility but provides limited operational detail.
Progressive warns of voter suppression; conservatives stress election integrity.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- StatesRequires states to verify citizenship, increasing administrative costs and staffing for election offices.
- Targeted stakeholdersRisks wrongful disenfranchisement of eligible citizens through database errors or improper verification.
- Federal agenciesLikely to prompt lawsuits over implementation, raising state and federal legal expenses.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressive warns of voter suppression; conservatives stress election integrity.
Likely opposes the amendment as unnecessary and potentially exclusionary.
Concern centers on disproportionate impact on immigrant communities and risks of voter suppression through stricter documentation rules.
Views the amendment with mixed feelings: favors citizen-only federal voting clarity but worries about constitutional amendment for administrative details.
Seeks clearer language on verification, due process, and federal-state balance.
Likely strongly supports the amendment as a measure to ensure only citizens influence federal elections.
Sees it as restoring election integrity and preventing noncitizen voting in national contests.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Constitutional amendments are rare; this proposal is ideologically charged and would need unusually wide, bipartisan and interstate support.
- Actual level of bipartisan congressional support
- State legislatures' willingness to ratify an amendment
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressive warns of voter suppression; conservatives stress election integrity.
Constitutional amendments are rare; this proposal is ideologically charged and would need unusually wide, bipartisan and interstate support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and concise constitutional amendment that establishes a new substantive rule (citizen-only voting in federal elections) and delegates enforcement authority…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.