H.J. Res. 155 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "William D…

Education|Education
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This joint resolution, submitted under the Congressional Review Act, would disapprove and nullify a Department of Education rule published at 90 Fed.

Reg. 48966 (October 31, 2025) concerning the William D.

Ford Federal Direct Loan Program.

Passage30/100

Narrow scope helps, but medium controversy, uncertain fiscal effects, and a challenging Senate path reduce overall odds.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that identifies the specific Department of Education rule and declares it to have no force or effect.

Contention70/100

Progressives prioritize borrower protections; conservatives prioritize agency stability.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Employers · BorrowersBorrowers
Likely helped
  • EmployersPrevents new compliance costs for colleges, loan servicers, and employers tied to the vacated rule.
  • BorrowersMaintains existing loan program terms for borrowers who prefer the prior regulatory framework.
  • Federal agenciesAvoids potential increases in federal outlays that supporters attribute to the vacated regulatory change.
Likely burdened
  • BorrowersBlocks an administrative reform that may have sought to improve borrower protections or servicing standards.
  • BorrowersCould delay or deny benefits to borrowers that the vacated rule would have implemented.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates regulatory uncertainty, potentially increasing administrative costs for the Department and contractors.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives prioritize borrower protections; conservatives prioritize agency stability.
Progressive90%

Likely supportive of the resolution because Democratic sponsors introduced it, implying the rule is seen as harmful to borrowers.

Views disapproval as a way to protect borrower relief and ensure the loan program treats students fairly.

Leans supportive
Centrist50%

Mixed view: supports congressional review but wants a clear, evidence-based justification for overturning an agency rule.

Will weigh operational impacts, costs, and whether disapproval narrowly addresses a concrete problem.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed to the resolution absent clear evidence the rule is harmful; opposes frequent use of CRA to reverse agency action and worries about destabilizing program administration.

May support DOE discretion or regulatory changes reducing federal obligations.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow scope helps, but medium controversy, uncertain fiscal effects, and a challenging Senate path reduce overall odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Text and substantive direction of the underlying Department of Education rule
  • Estimated budgetary impact absent a published CBO score in the bill text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives prioritize borrower protections; conservatives prioritize agency stability.

Narrow scope helps, but medium controversy, uncertain fiscal effects, and a challenging Senate path reduce overall odds.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that identifies the specific Department of Education rule and declares it to have no force or ef…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis