H.J. Res. 165 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule…

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 30, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This joint resolution, under the Congressional Review Act (chapter 8 of title 5), disapproves the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's rule that withdrew the 2022 CFPB rule titled “Fair Credit Reporting; Permissible Purposes for Furnishing, Using, and Obtaining Consumer Reports.” If enacted, the withdrawal (90 Fed.

Reg. 20084 (May 12, 2025)) would be nullified and have no force or effect, leaving the 2022 rule (87 Fed.

Reg. 41243 (July 12, 2022)) in place.

Passage35/100

Narrow CRA approach improves prospects versus broad reforms, but partisan alignment, Senate procedure, and executive signature/veto concerns lower chances.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise CRA-style joint resolution that clearly identifies and effects congressional disapproval of a single specified Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection rule. It states the legal outcome (the rule shall have no force or effect) with the specificity expected for this instrument.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize consumer privacy and protections.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
ConsumersConsumers
Likely helped
  • ConsumersMaintains consumer privacy protections restricting access to consumer reports.
  • ConsumersPreserves standards intended to limit improper sharing and misuse of consumer report data.
  • ConsumersProvides regulatory certainty for consumers and advocates by keeping the 2022 rule in effect.
Likely burdened
  • ConsumersMaintains compliance costs for businesses that rely on broader consumer report access.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould impede legitimate uses like credit underwriting, employment checks, or fraud prevention.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRestricts CFPB's regulatory flexibility to update or rescind rules to changing markets.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize consumer privacy and protections.
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because the resolution blocks a CFPB action that removed a consumer-protection rule.

They would view keeping the 2022 rule as protecting consumer privacy and limiting unjustified access to consumer reports.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable if the 2022 rule's benefits justify compliance costs.

They want clearer cost-benefit analysis and prefer technical fixes over partisan use of CRA.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed because the resolution blocks an agency rollback of a regulation, preserving what they may view as an overbroad or burdensome CFPB rule.

They prefer agency flexibility and less federal regulatory constraint on businesses.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Narrow CRA approach improves prospects versus broad reforms, but partisan alignment, Senate procedure, and executive signature/veto concerns lower chances.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate procedural hurdles and potential extended debate
  • Executive branch signing or veto decision
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize consumer privacy and protections.

Narrow CRA approach improves prospects versus broad reforms, but partisan alignment, Senate procedure, and executive signature/veto concern…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise CRA-style joint resolution that clearly identifies and effects congressional disapproval of a single specified Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection ru…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis