Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §8143b(a)(1) to change which employees engaged in fire protection activities qualify for worker’s compensation under chapter 81. It inserts additional covered roles (for example, fuels specialists, burn bosses, prescribed-fire crew members, ambulance personnel), adds planned ignition and fuels reduction/prevention activities to covered duties, and removes a prior subparagraph (D).
Liberal emphasizes expanded protections and modern wildfire risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive change amending 5 U.S.C. §8143b(a)(1) to alter the enumerated fire protection activities and job classifications covered under chapter 81 worker's compensation rules.
This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §8143b(a)(1) to change which employees engaged in fire protection activities qualify for worker’s compensation under chapter 81.
It inserts additional covered roles (for example, fuels specialists, burn bosses, prescribed-fire crew members, ambulance personnel), adds planned ignition and fuels reduction/prevention activities to covered duties, and removes a prior subparagraph (D).
The amendments also alter wording about employees employed "for all or a substantial part of the year."
Technically narrow and sympathetic subject increases chances, but modest fiscal effect and legislative calendar uncertainty limit likelihood.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive change amending 5 U.S.C. §8143b(a)(1) to alter the enumerated fire protection activities and job classifications covered under chapter 81 worker's compensation rules. It specifies textual insertions and deletions but does not present a consolidated final statutory paragraph, nor does it include implementation timing, fiscal analysis, definitions to reduce ambiguity, or oversight provisions.
Liberal emphasizes expanded protections and modern wildfire risks.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes expanded protections and modern wildfire risks.
Likely views the bill positively as a targeted expansion of protections for frontline wildfire workers and allied emergency personnel.
Sees inclusion of prescribed fire and support staff as closing protections gaps for workers exposed to smoke, heat, and other hazards.
Generally favorable as a pragmatic expansion of worker protections, but wants clearer definitions and a fiscal analysis.
Sees value in protecting responders while seeking administrative clarity to avoid unintended costs.
Skeptical about expanding federal workers' compensation coverage and potential new liabilities.
May accept targeted protections for first responders but worries about cost, federal overreach, and ambiguous scope that could expand benefits broadly.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically narrow and sympathetic subject increases chances, but modest fiscal effect and legislative calendar uncertainty limit likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes expanded protections and modern wildfire risks.
Technically narrow and sympathetic subject increases chances, but modest fiscal effect and legislative calendar uncertainty limit likelihoo…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive change amending 5 U.S.C. §8143b(a)(1) to alter the enumerated fire protection activities and job classifications covered under chapter 81 wor…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.