H.R. 10006 (119th)Bill Overview

Increasing Opportunity For Reindustrialization Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jul 30, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends Section 1400Z–1 of the Internal Revenue Code to allow population census tracts that contain any portion of a former Department of Defense installation closed under a BRAC round to be designated as Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs) even if they do not meet existing low-income community requirements. It also exempts those nominated tracts from the State designation limits by increasing the number of tracts a State may designate.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize equity, labor, and environmental safeguards.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies where and how to change existing law to permit census tracts containing former BRAC‑closed DoD installations to be designated as qualified opportunity zones.

This bill amends Section 1400Z–1 of the Internal Revenue Code to allow population census tracts that contain any portion of a former Department of Defense installation closed under a BRAC round to be designated as Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs) even if they do not meet existing low-income community requirements.

It also exempts those nominated tracts from the State designation limits by increasing the number of tracts a State may designate.

The amendments apply to QOZ designations made after enactment.

Passage50/100

A narrow, administrable amendment with modest fiscal effects improves prospects, but lack of offsets and broader OZ criticism create uncertainty, especially in the Senate.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies where and how to change existing law to permit census tracts containing former BRAC‑closed DoD installations to be designated as qualified opportunity zones. It provides precise statutory text and an effective date, integrating directly with the current section 1400Z–1 designation framework.

Contention55/100

Liberals emphasize equity, labor, and environmental safeguards.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay attract private capital to redevelop former military installations using opportunity zone tax incentives.
  • Potential benefitCould accelerate reuse of existing infrastructure, lowering redevelopment costs compared with greenfield projects.
  • Local governmentsMay create local construction and operations jobs during and after site redevelopment.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesExpands a federal tax expenditure, likely reducing federal revenue relative to no expansion.
  • Potential burdenMay direct tax benefits primarily to investors rather than low-income residents of those areas.
  • Potential burdenCould encourage redevelopment before comprehensive environmental remediation, raising liability and cleanup concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize equity, labor, and environmental safeguards.
Progressive30%

Likely skeptical.

While the measure targets reuse of closed military sites and potential local investment, QOZ tax breaks historically favor wealthy investors.

Without explicit community, labor, or environmental protections in the text, progressive concerns about equity and accountability will dominate.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Cautiously optimistic.

The bill targets a defined class of properties (BRAC-closed installations) for economic reuse, which could be pragmatic.

However, centrists will want safeguards for fiscal oversight, measurable job outcomes, and environmental clarity before full endorsement.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Generally supportive.

Expanding QOZ eligibility to BRAC-closed tracts encourages private investment, reduces federal management burdens, and promotes reindustrialization through market incentives rather than new spending.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

A narrow, administrable amendment with modest fiscal effects improves prospects, but lack of offsets and broader OZ criticism create uncertainty, especially in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • CBO/Joint Committee revenue score and magnitude
  • Number and value of tracts affected nationwide
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize equity, labor, and environmental safeguards.

A narrow, administrable amendment with modest fiscal effects improves prospects, but lack of offsets and broader OZ criticism create uncert…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies where and how to change existing law to permit census tracts containi…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis