H.R. 10091 (119th)Bill Overview

Mueller-Keating Memorial Highway Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Aug 13, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill designates a 26-mile segment of Interstate 17 in Arizona (milepost 237 to 263) as the Kayla Jean Mueller and Charles H. Keating IV Memorial Highway (commonly Mueller-Keating Memorial Highway).

Why people may split

Centrist concerns about precedent and use of congressional time

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured commemorative designation that clearly states purpose, identifies the segment to be named, and assigns modest administrative steps for implementation.

This bill designates a 26-mile segment of Interstate 17 in Arizona (milepost 237 to 263) as the Kayla Jean Mueller and Charles H.

Keating IV Memorial Highway (commonly Mueller-Keating Memorial Highway).

It includes congressional findings about the two honorees and directs the Secretary of Transportation, with state and local authorities, to permit honorary signage and memorialization at the Sunset Point Rest Area and to list the designation on the Department of Transportation website.

Passage85/100

Honorary, localized designation with no budgetary or policy effects; such bills commonly clear committee and both chambers absent unrelated objections.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured commemorative designation that clearly states purpose, identifies the segment to be named, and assigns modest administrative steps for implementation.

Contention12/100

Centrist concerns about precedent and use of congressional time

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsLocal governments · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides formal federal recognition honoring a humanitarian worker and a fallen service member.
  • Local governmentsCreates a local symbol that may boost community pride and remembrance.
  • Permitting processPermits installation of honorary signage and memorialization at Sunset Point Rest Area.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsMay impose modest state or local costs for sign fabrication, installation, and maintenance.
  • StatesRequires coordination between DOT and state authorities, creating a small administrative burden.
  • Potential burdenAdds another honorary name that some may view as duplicative or unnecessary.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Centrist concerns about precedent and use of congressional time
Progressive90%

Generally supportive of honoring a humanitarian aid worker and a service member who died confronting ISIS; views the bipartisan memorialization as a recognition of both humanitarian service and sacrifice.

May be attentive to whether this reinforces militaristic narratives, but notes the bill explicitly honors both compassion and military service.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Likes that the bill is narrowly focused, symbolic, and low-cost.

Will weigh benefits of public recognition against precedent of federal honorary namings and prefer state coordination to avoid costs or redundancy.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Strongly supportive of honoring a U.S. Navy SEAL killed in action and an Arizonan humanitarian victim of ISIS; sees it as appropriate recognition of valor and sacrifice while opposing new federal spending.

Appreciates emphasis on defeating ISIS.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Honorary, localized designation with no budgetary or policy effects; such bills commonly clear committee and both chambers absent unrelated objections.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether Arizona will accept and fund signage installation
  • Potential local disagreements about the chosen name
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Centrist concerns about precedent and use of congressional time

Honorary, localized designation with no budgetary or policy effects; such bills commonly clear committee and both chambers absent unrelated…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured commemorative designation that clearly states purpose, identifies the segment to be named, and assigns modest administrative steps for implementa…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis