H.R. 10093 (119th)Bill Overview

Cancer Research Trust Fund Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Aug 13, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Creates a Cancer Research Trust Fund in the Treasury funded by an amount equal to 10% of gross import duties on tobacco and tobacco substitute articles each fiscal year. The Treasury transfers amounts on request to HHS, which (coordinating with the Secretary of War acting through the Director of the Defense Health Agency) must use funds for R&D into early screening, prevention, treatments, and innovative therapies, prioritizing rare cancers and pediatric cancers.

Why people may split

Size and stability of funding: adequate versus too small or volatile

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a clear substantive funding mechanism (a Treasury trust fund funded by 10% of specified import duties) and identifies agency roles and high-level program priorities, but it provides limited implementation detail, fiscal treatment, statutory integration, safeguards, and accountability provisions.

Creates a Cancer Research Trust Fund in the Treasury funded by an amount equal to 10% of gross import duties on tobacco and tobacco substitute articles each fiscal year.

The Treasury transfers amounts on request to HHS, which (coordinating with the Secretary of War acting through the Director of the Defense Health Agency) must use funds for R&D into early screening, prevention, treatments, and innovative therapies, prioritizing rare cancers and pediatric cancers.

Passage50/100

Moderate likelihood: non-controversial policy and clear purpose help, but dedicated revenue routing and budget rules create uncertainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a clear substantive funding mechanism (a Treasury trust fund funded by 10% of specified import duties) and identifies agency roles and high-level program priorities, but it provides limited implementation detail, fiscal treatment, statutory integration, safeguards, and accountability provisions.

Contention50/100

Size and stability of funding: adequate versus too small or volatile

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates a dedicated revenue stream specifically supporting cancer research activities.
  • Potential benefitTargets additional resources toward rare cancers and pediatric oncology, often underfunded areas.
  • Potential benefitMay support jobs in biomedical research, clinical trials, and related healthcare services.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesDiverts ten percent of customs duties on tobacco from general Treasury receipts, reducing unrestricted federal revenue.
  • Potential burdenAnnual funding will vary with tobacco import levels, producing unstable research budget flows.
  • Potential burdenCreates additional administrative work to calculate, transfer, and audit the statute's specified share.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Size and stability of funding: adequate versus too small or volatile
Progressive85%

Generally supportive because it directs dedicated revenue to cancer research and prioritizes rare and pediatric cancers.

Concerned the revenue stream may be too small or volatile and that broader equity and prevention measures could be stronger.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Cautiously favorable: creates a politically popular fund using a user-pays revenue source.

Wants clarity on expected funding scale, oversight, and interaction with existing NIH/NCI programs.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Mixed to mildly skeptical: supports cancer research in principle but wary of creating a new federal trust fund and diverting customs revenue.

Prefers efficient use and offsets for new spending.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

Moderate likelihood: non-controversial policy and clear purpose help, but dedicated revenue routing and budget rules create uncertainty.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Magnitude of revenue from specified import duties
  • How PAYGO and budget scoring will treat the dedicated transfers
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Size and stability of funding: adequate versus too small or volatile

Moderate likelihood: non-controversial policy and clear purpose help, but dedicated revenue routing and budget rules create uncertainty.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a clear substantive funding mechanism (a Treasury trust fund funded by 10% of specified import duties) and identifies agency roles and high-level program prio…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis