Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill amends the Higher Education Act to expand federal support for accessibility and inclusion of students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Key provisions create and fund competitive grant programs for faculty training and universal design, require institutions to establish an office of accessibility with defined duties, form a commission to develop guidelines for accessible electronic instructional materials, expand and fund inclusive programs and data collection for students with intellectual disabilities, and authorize a National Technical Assistance Center and a Coordinating Center.
Liberals emphasize civil-rights gains and UDL benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive policy package that amends the Higher Education Act to expand programs, create institutional duties, establish national centers and a commission, and require data collection and reporting to improve postsecondary access and outcomes for students with disabilities.
This bill amends the Higher Education Act to expand federal support for accessibility and inclusion of students with disabilities in postsecondary education.
Key provisions create and fund competitive grant programs for faculty training and universal design, require institutions to establish an office of accessibility with defined duties, form a commission to develop guidelines for accessible electronic instructional materials, expand and fund inclusive programs and data collection for students with intellectual disabilities, and authorize a National Technical Assistance Center and a Coordinating Center.
The bill also adds institutional reporting of basic disability enrollment and outcomes data to federal postsecondary datasets and makes several technical amendments.
Substantive, narrow disability-access reforms have bipartisan potential, but multiple funding authorizations, institutional mandates, and implementation details lower standalone odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive policy package that amends the Higher Education Act to expand programs, create institutional duties, establish national centers and a commission, and require data collection and reporting to improve postsecondary access and outcomes for students with disabilities.
Liberals emphasize civil-rights gains and UDL benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize civil-rights gains and UDL benefits
Overall supportive: strengthens disability rights, promotes universal design, and funds inclusive pathways to degrees and employment.
Sees the bill as advancing equity and removing barriers to postsecondary participation and completion for students with disabilities.
Generally favorable if implemented with clear guidance and reasonable funding.
Values evidence-based training, measurable outcomes, and sustainability plans but worries about administrative burden on smaller institutions.
Cautious to opposed: supports assistance for students with disabilities but concerned about expanded federal mandates, new bureaucracy, and potential unfunded costs to institutions.
Prefers state or institutional control and limits on federal reporting obligations.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantive, narrow disability-access reforms have bipartisan potential, but multiple funding authorizations, institutional mandates, and implementation details lower standalone odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize civil-rights gains and UDL benefits
Substantive, narrow disability-access reforms have bipartisan potential, but multiple funding authorizations, institutional mandates, and i…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive policy package that amends the Higher Education Act to expand programs, create institutional duties, establish national centers and a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.