H.R. 10223 (119th)Bill Overview

End Tuberculosis Now Act of 2026

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Sep 2, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The End Tuberculosis Now Act of 2026 amends the Foreign Assistance Act to make ending tuberculosis (TB) a declared U.S. foreign assistance objective. It authorizes the President to provide bilateral and multilateral assistance focused on diagnosis, treatment, prevention, research and development, procurement, and health-system strengthening, and sets specific 2027–2030 global targets (incidence and mortality reductions, diagnostic and treatment coverage, and preventive treatment for 30 million people).

Why people may split

Funding: liberals seek robust appropriations; conservatives demand offsets

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act that clearly defines priorities, establishes ambitious goals and detailed reporting requirements, and integrates with existing statutory authorities.

The End Tuberculosis Now Act of 2026 amends the Foreign Assistance Act to make ending tuberculosis (TB) a declared U.S. foreign assistance objective.

It authorizes the President to provide bilateral and multilateral assistance focused on diagnosis, treatment, prevention, research and development, procurement, and health-system strengthening, and sets specific 2027–2030 global targets (incidence and mortality reductions, diagnostic and treatment coverage, and preventive treatment for 30 million people).

The bill requires annual reporting to Congress, a Comptroller General evaluation within four years, coordination with partners, and sunsets the authority on January 1, 2033.

Passage35/100

Substantive, non-controversial health authorization with clear goals, but depends on future appropriations and Senate clearance.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act that clearly defines priorities, establishes ambitious goals and detailed reporting requirements, and integrates with existing statutory authorities. It authorizes assistance and sets programmatic expectations but leaves financing and many operational implementation details to executive determination.

Contention28/100

Funding: liberals seek robust appropriations; conservatives demand offsets

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCould substantially reduce global TB incidence and mortality through expanded diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
  • WorkersStrengthens partner-country health systems, laboratory networks, and surveillance capacities for respiratory disease re…
  • Potential benefitStimulates research, diagnostics, and vaccine development, potentially creating biomedical research and manufacturing j…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates substantial additional U.S. foreign assistance obligations and likely increases federal spending commitments.
  • Potential burdenSets ambitious numerical targets that may be infeasible within the 2027–2030 timeframe.
  • Federal agenciesAdds administrative and reporting burdens for federal agencies, implementers, and partner countries.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Funding: liberals seek robust appropriations; conservatives demand offsets
Progressive95%

Strongly supportive.

The bill treats TB as a global public-health and equity priority, emphasizes patient-centered care, vulnerable populations, and community-led outreach.

It funds R&D, diagnostics, and integration into primary care while including robust reporting and accountability.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive with caution.

The bill sets clear goals, monitoring, and coordination mechanisms that appeal to pragmatic oversight preferences.

Concerns focus on concrete funding, minimizing duplication, and ensuring efficient implementation in partner countries.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

Cautiously mixed.

The goal of reducing TB and strengthening pandemic defenses is acceptable, but the bill raises concerns about increased foreign assistance commitments, fiscal cost, and potential federal micromanagement of international programs.

The America First language and sunset clause are modestly reassuring.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Substantive, non-controversial health authorization with clear goals, but depends on future appropriations and Senate clearance.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No appropriation amounts specified
  • Feasibility of aggressive 2027–2030 targets
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Funding: liberals seek robust appropriations; conservatives demand offsets

Substantive, non-controversial health authorization with clear goals, but depends on future appropriations and Senate clearance.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act that clearly defines priorities, establishes ambitious goals and detailed reporting requirements, and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis