H.R. 1100 (119th)Bill Overview

STOPP Act

Crime and Law Enforcement|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresCrime and Law Enforcement
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for co…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to regulate tableting and encapsulating machines and specified "critical parts." It requires serialization, registration, recordkeeping, reporting, and a National Pill Press Registry maintained by the Attorney General. The Attorney General is authorized to issue regulations, inspect registrants, assess fees, and deny, suspend, or revoke registrations.

Why people may split

Scope of AG regulatory power versus need for precise limits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a detailed substantive regulatory framework that meaningfully changes legal obligations and enforcement for tableting/encapsulating machines and specified parts, and it reasonably delegates implementation specifics to the Attorney General while integrating into existing Controlled Substances Act structures.

This bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to regulate tableting and encapsulating machines and specified "critical parts." It requires serialization, registration, recordkeeping, reporting, and a National Pill Press Registry maintained by the Attorney General.

The Attorney General is authorized to issue regulations, inspect registrants, assess fees, and deny, suspend, or revoke registrations.

The bill also creates new offenses and penalties for violating serialization, reporting, and registration requirements, with staggered effective dates and limited affirmative defenses for pre-existing owners.

Passage45/100

Moderate chance: law‑enforcement framing helps, but regulatory burden, administrative costs, and industry resistance reduce odds absent compromise or attachment.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a detailed substantive regulatory framework that meaningfully changes legal obligations and enforcement for tableting/encapsulating machines and specified parts, and it reasonably delegates implementation specifics to the Attorney General while integrating into existing Controlled Substances Act structures.

Contention68/100

Scope of AG regulatory power versus need for precise limits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedManufacturers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitImproves law enforcement traceability of pill presses and parts, aiding investigations into illicit drug manufacture.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce illicit fentanyl pill production by disrupting access to industrial pill-making equipment and parts.
  • Potential benefitCreates a national registry to centralize information on machines, enabling faster seizure and interdiction.
Likely burdened
  • ManufacturersImposes compliance costs on manufacturers, importers, dealers, and related businesses to register and serialize equipme…
  • ManufacturersSmall manufacturers and hobbyists may face disproportionate regulatory burdens and potential loss of business.
  • Potential burdenConfidential business information and trade secrets could be exposed via a centralized registry.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Scope of AG regulatory power versus need for precise limits
Progressive85%

Generally supportive as a practical law-enforcement and public-health tool to curb illicit pill production and fentanyl deaths.

Sees serialization and registry as targeted measures to disrupt illegal pill presses if paired with treatment and prevention funding.

Concerned about overcriminalization of small legitimate businesses and privacy on the registry.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Views the bill as a reasonable, enforceable step to disrupt illicit opioid production if implemented with clear rules and proportionality.

Likes measurable requirements — serialization, registration, records — but worries about administrative burden and regulatory clarity.

Will seek cost estimates, phased implementation, and protections for legitimate industry and research.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical due to expansion of federal regulatory power and new registration burdens.

While endorsing efforts to stop illegal fentanyl production, views the bill as federal overreach that may harm manufacturers, commerce, and property rights.

Worried about needless bureaucracy, fees, and potential misuse of a national registry.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Moderate chance: law‑enforcement framing helps, but regulatory burden, administrative costs, and industry resistance reduce odds absent compromise or attachment.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score provided
  • Scope of parts ultimately defined by AG regulations
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Scope of AG regulatory power versus need for precise limits

Moderate chance: law‑enforcement framing helps, but regulatory burden, administrative costs, and industry resistance reduce odds absent com…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a detailed substantive regulatory framework that meaningfully changes legal obligations and enforcement for tableting/encapsulating machines and specified…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis