H.R. 1297 (119th)Bill Overview

LPOE Modernization Trust Fund Act

Immigration|Immigration
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Feb 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Creates the Land Port of Entry (LPOE) Modernization Trust Fund to finance construction, expansion, technology, repairs, and hiring at U.S. land ports of entry.

Funds come from specified percentages of existing customs and visa-related fees, a transfer of up to $1.6 billion, and new surcharges on certain immigration, land-border, and visa fees.

Establishes an LPOE Oversight Board of federal officials and industry/local representatives, requires annual reports, limits using fee increases to offset deposits, and requires appropriations for expenditures.

Passage45/100

Moderately scoped infrastructure bill with dedicated funding appeals to trade and local officials, but fee surcharges and border associations raise political friction and Senate obstacles.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention30/100

Progressive worries funds enable enforcement; conservatives emphasize security benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersConsumers
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a dedicated trust fund to finance land port of entry modernization projects.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides stable, predictable funding sources for construction, technology, and major repairs at land ports.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould reduce border processing delays and increase commercial throughput through infrastructure and technology upgrades.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersImposes new surcharges and redirects existing fees, increasing costs for travelers, visa applicants, and certain users.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRedirects up to $1.6 billion of Merchandise Processing Fees, reducing funds available for other Customs programs.
  • ConsumersTreatment of user fees may shift costs to importers and consumers, raising trade transaction costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive worries funds enable enforcement; conservatives emphasize security benefits
Progressive60%

Generally supportive of infrastructure and staffing for ports that can ease trade and processing, but cautious about using immigrant-focused fees and expanding enforcement capacity.

Concerned funding could finance harsher border enforcement rather than humanitarian processing or labor protections.

Wants strict transparency, civil-rights safeguards, and limits on enforcement escalation.

Split reaction
Centrist75%

Views the bill as a pragmatic, targeted infrastructure and trade facilitation measure with built-in oversight and appropriations control.

Likes dedicated funding and interagency consultation but wants clearer cost estimates and measurable performance metrics.

Will seek assurances on fiscal transparency and proper prioritization.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Likely supportive of modernizing ports, improving trade flow, and hiring more CBP officers to strengthen border control.

Concerned about fee hikes and creation of a new trust fund that earmarks revenue.

Wants assurance funds enhance security and commerce, not unnecessary bureaucracy.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Moderately scoped infrastructure bill with dedicated funding appeals to trade and local officials, but fee surcharges and border associations raise political friction and Senate obstacles.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Actual revenue estimates and CBO score not included
  • Political receptiveness to new surcharges on travelers and immigrants
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive worries funds enable enforcement; conservatives emphasize security benefits

Moderately scoped infrastructure bill with dedicated funding appeals to trade and local officials, but fee surcharges and border associatio…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for LPOE Modernization Trust Fund Act.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis