- Targeted stakeholdersProvides a predictable $56 million annually for observation system operations and maintenance.
- Targeted stakeholdersImproves regional data sharing practices, enhancing coastal situational awareness for stakeholders.
- Targeted stakeholdersSupports better monitoring of storms, coastal flooding, and ocean weather, aiding public safety and response.
To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.
Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
This bill reauthorizes and amends the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.
It renames or reclassifies certain governance language ("Council" to "Committee"), adds language emphasizing operational oceanography and "ocean weather," requires regional offices and federally funded projects to collaborate with regional coastal observing systems for data sharing, and authorizes $56,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Technical reauthorization with modest funding historically attracts bipartisan support, though appropriations and procedural Senate steps remain risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward reauthorization that makes targeted statutory changes and sets a multi-year authorization level while leaving implementation largely to existing statutory mechanisms.
Left emphasizes climate/resilience benefits; right emphasizes federal cost concerns.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesAdds federal spending without specifying offsets, increasing budgetary commitments over five years.
- Federal agenciesMay impose administrative and compliance burdens on regional offices and federally funded projects.
- Federal agenciesCould be viewed as expanding federal influence over regional observing priorities or data policies.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Left emphasizes climate/resilience benefits; right emphasizes federal cost concerns.
Likely broadly supportive.
The bill bolsters publicly funded coastal and ocean observing, mandates regional data sharing, and secures multi-year funding for observation infrastructure and science.
Generally favorable but pragmatic.
The bill modernizes observation policy, mandates regional collaboration, and provides a defined funding stream; centrists will weigh costs and oversight measures.
Cautious to skeptical.
While recognizing the value of ocean observations, the persona worries about increased federal spending, bureaucratic reorganization, and potential mandates on regional actors.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technical reauthorization with modest funding historically attracts bipartisan support, though appropriations and procedural Senate steps remain risks.
- No CBO/score included in text
- Whether appropriators will fund the authorized amounts
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Left emphasizes climate/resilience benefits; right emphasizes federal cost concerns.
Technical reauthorization with modest funding historically attracts bipartisan support, though appropriations and procedural Senate steps r…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward reauthorization that makes targeted statutory changes and sets a multi-year authorization level while leaving implementation largely to…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.