H.R. 2294 (119th)Bill Overview

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Advanced technology and technological innovationsAdvisory bodies
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Mar 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill reauthorizes and amends the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

It renames or reclassifies certain governance language ("Council" to "Committee"), adds language emphasizing operational oceanography and "ocean weather," requires regional offices and federally funded projects to collaborate with regional coastal observing systems for data sharing, and authorizes $56,000,000 per year for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.

Passage70/100

Technical reauthorization with modest funding historically attracts bipartisan support, though appropriations and procedural Senate steps remain risks.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward reauthorization that makes targeted statutory changes and sets a multi-year authorization level while leaving implementation largely to existing statutory mechanisms.

Contention28/100

Left emphasizes climate/resilience benefits; right emphasizes federal cost concerns.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides a predictable $56 million annually for observation system operations and maintenance.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImproves regional data sharing practices, enhancing coastal situational awareness for stakeholders.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSupports better monitoring of storms, coastal flooding, and ocean weather, aiding public safety and response.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesAdds federal spending without specifying offsets, increasing budgetary commitments over five years.
  • Federal agenciesMay impose administrative and compliance burdens on regional offices and federally funded projects.
  • Federal agenciesCould be viewed as expanding federal influence over regional observing priorities or data policies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes climate/resilience benefits; right emphasizes federal cost concerns.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive.

The bill bolsters publicly funded coastal and ocean observing, mandates regional data sharing, and secures multi-year funding for observation infrastructure and science.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The bill modernizes observation policy, mandates regional collaboration, and provides a defined funding stream; centrists will weigh costs and oversight measures.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Cautious to skeptical.

While recognizing the value of ocean observations, the persona worries about increased federal spending, bureaucratic reorganization, and potential mandates on regional actors.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Technical reauthorization with modest funding historically attracts bipartisan support, though appropriations and procedural Senate steps remain risks.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO/score included in text
  • Whether appropriators will fund the authorized amounts
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes climate/resilience benefits; right emphasizes federal cost concerns.

Technical reauthorization with modest funding historically attracts bipartisan support, though appropriations and procedural Senate steps r…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward reauthorization that makes targeted statutory changes and sets a multi-year authorization level while leaving implementation largely to…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis