Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case fo…
The bill prevents Federal authorizations for broadband projects located in defined rights-of-way on Federal land from being treated as a "major Federal action" under NEPA and from being treated as an "undertaking" under the National Historic Preservation Act.
It defines key terms including "broadband project," "broadband provider," "Federal authorization," and "right-of-way," and excludes portions of the Interstate System from the right-of-way definition.
Narrow, low-cost deregulatory measure increases prospects, but explicit NEPA/NHPA exemptions raise controversy and reduce likelihood without compromise or attachment to a larger bill.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive policy change that clearly states an exemption from NEPA and NHPA for defined broadband projects in rights-of-way and provides key definitions, but it provides minimal implementation, fiscal, edge-case, or oversight detail.
Progressives emphasize lost NEPA and NHPA protections; conservatives emphasize deregulation benefits.
Progressives emphasize lost NEPA and NHPA protections; conservatives emphasize deregulation benefits.
Supports expanded broadband access in principle but worries the bill removes important environmental, historic, and tribal review safeguards.
Views the exemptions as risky without additional protections for cultural and ecological resources.
Sees a reasonable rationale for reducing red tape to accelerate broadband, but wants safeguards and transparency to prevent environmental and cultural harm.
Would favor amendments to preserve minimal oversight and public notice.
Favors the bill as a pro-infrastructure, deregulatory measure that removes burdensome federal reviews and encourages private broadband investment on federal rights-of-way.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost deregulatory measure increases prospects, but explicit NEPA/NHPA exemptions raise controversy and reduce likelihood without compromise or attachment to a larger bill.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize lost NEPA and NHPA protections; conservatives emphasize deregulation benefits.
Narrow, low-cost deregulatory measure increases prospects, but explicit NEPA/NHPA exemptions raise controversy and reduce likelihood withou…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive policy change that clearly states an exemption from NEPA and NHPA for defined broadband projects in rights-of-way and provides key definition…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.