H.R. 2316 (119th)Bill Overview

Wetlands Conservation and Access Improvement Act of 2025

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Public Lands and Natural ResourcesWildlife conservation and habitat protection
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Mar 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to change the fiscal year when interest on obligations held in the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Fund becomes available for apportionment.

The date is moved from fiscal year 2026 to fiscal year 2033.

The change delays the point at which accumulated interest may be distributed under the existing statute.

Passage80/100

Narrow, low-visibility technical amendment with limited fiscal effect; such fixes historically clear Congress absent unrelated procedural objections.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and precise statutory amendment that clearly accomplishes a narrow change — substituting one fiscal year for another in an existing statute. The drafting is unambiguous and directly targets the relevant codified provision.

Contention45/100

Progressives emphasize immediate conservation harm from delayed funds.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments · States
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersAllows additional interest to accrue, potentially increasing total funds available in 2033.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay enable larger lump-sum apportionments that could fund larger conservation and access projects.
  • Federal agenciesProvides more time for federal administrators and states to plan major wetlands projects.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsDelays near-term funding transfers to states and local entities that rely on apportionments.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay postpone planned conservation, access, or maintenance projects and associated employment.
  • StatesCreates short-term cash-flow uncertainty for state wildlife agencies budgeting projects.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize immediate conservation harm from delayed funds.
Progressive20%

Likely critical: the change delays funds that support wetlands, habitat restoration, and public access projects.

They would worry this postponement reduces near-term conservation capacity and harms on-the-ground projects, especially for states and tribal partners dependent on apportionments.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed: recognizes the technical, timing-focused nature of the amendment but seeks clear justification.

Wants evidence this delay improves outcomes and does not unduly harm state programs or create administrative confusion.

Split reaction
Conservative70%

Generally favorable: views the bill as a modest fiscal/timing adjustment that delays federal disbursements.

Appreciates constraining near-term outlays and allowing interest to accumulate, pending no new spending mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood80/100

Narrow, low-visibility technical amendment with limited fiscal effect; such fixes historically clear Congress absent unrelated procedural objections.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or cost estimate included in text
  • Impact on state apportionments between 2026–2032 unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize immediate conservation harm from delayed funds.

Narrow, low-visibility technical amendment with limited fiscal effect; such fixes historically clear Congress absent unrelated procedural o…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and precise statutory amendment that clearly accomplishes a narrow change — substituting one fiscal year for another in an existing statute. The drafting…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis