H.R. 2407 (119th)Bill Overview

SNAP Reform and Upward Mobility Act of 2025

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill requires the Census Bureau to augment poverty measurement by matching administrative data on federal benefits, establishes a commission to value benefits, and mandates GAO comparisons.

It makes multiple changes to SNAP: new statutory purposes emphasizing employment and self-sufficiency; tightened work and eligibility rules; state matching requirements for administrative funds ramping to 50%; EBT authorized-user limits and penalties; stricter vendor disqualification and fraud-reporting provisions; and new state reporting and outcomes tracking for employment-and-training programs.

Passage30/100

Comprehensive, ideologically charged SNAP reforms plus data-sharing mandates face strong debate; Senate hurdles and state resistance reduce odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive policy package that couples programmatic changes to SNAP with measures to change poverty measurement and oversight. It contains many explicit statutory amendments, reporting requirements, and enforcement mechanisms, but it leaves significant resourcing and some operational detail to implementing agencies without explicit appropriation or granular procedural direction in the text provided.

Contention75/100

Liberals emphasize privacy, access, and cost-shift harms to beneficiaries

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesStates
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersBetter poverty measurement using administrative data could improve program targeting and policy evaluation.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpanded employment reporting and work-focused provisions may increase emphasis on job placement and training.
  • Federal agenciesA federal commission to value noncash benefits would standardize benefit valuation across programs for comparisons.
Likely burdened
  • StatesRising state matching requirements up to 50% will increase fiscal pressure on state budgets.
  • Targeted stakeholdersNew eligibility rule requiring six months receipt of another means-tested benefit could exclude vulnerable households.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMandatory cooperation with fraud investigations and EBT sanctions may reduce access and raise due-process concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize privacy, access, and cost-shift harms to beneficiaries
Progressive10%

Likely critical.

Support for better measurement is welcome, but many SNAP provisions raise concerns about access, privacy, and shifting costs to needy households and states.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view.

Supports better data and accountability for anti-poverty programs, but wary of administrative burdens, cost-shifting to states, and unclear definitions that may produce unintended harm.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Generally favorable.

Values provisions that promote work, reduce fraud, and give states more responsibility and discretion over SNAP administration and vendor enforcement.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Comprehensive, ideologically charged SNAP reforms plus data-sharing mandates face strong debate; Senate hurdles and state resistance reduce odds.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimate for federal and state fiscal impacts
  • Legal/privacy challenges to mandated tax and benefit data sharing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize privacy, access, and cost-shift harms to beneficiaries

Comprehensive, ideologically charged SNAP reforms plus data-sharing mandates face strong debate; Senate hurdles and state resistance reduce…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive policy package that couples programmatic changes to SNAP with measures to change poverty measurement and oversight. It contains many ex…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis