H.R. 2819 (119th)Bill Overview

DRIVE Act

Transportation and Public Works|Transportation and Public Works
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill (DRIVE Act) would prohibit the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) from issuing any rule that requires vehicles with a gross vehicle weight over 26,000 pounds operating in interstate commerce to be fitted with a speed-limiting device set to a maximum speed.

It removes FMCSA authority to mandate such speed limiters but does not itself mandate any device settings or new requirements.

Passage30/100

Modest chance to pass a receptive House; significant Senate hurdles and likely stakeholder pushback make final enactment uncertain.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive policy measure that plainly prohibits the FMCSA Administrator from issuing rules requiring speed limiting devices on interstate vehicles over 26,000 pounds. The operative prohibition is clear but minimal.

Contention72/100

Progressives stress safety and emissions benefits of speed limiters

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces compliance and capital costs for carriers who would otherwise install speed limiters.
  • Targeted stakeholdersPreserves operational flexibility for fleet managers and drivers regarding vehicle cruising speeds.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAvoids administrative burden and rulemaking costs for FMCSA and regulated entities.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould increase highway crash risk and related fatalities by allowing higher maximum vehicle speeds.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay raise fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions if average heavy vehicle speeds increase.
  • Federal agenciesRemoves a federal standard-making tool, limiting national harmonization of heavy-vehicle safety measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress safety and emissions benefits of speed limiters
Progressive20%

Likely opposed.

Seen as a rollback of a potential safety regulation that could reduce crash severity and fatalities involving large trucks.

Viewed as limiting the agency's ability to adopt evidence-based safety measures.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view.

Balances safety benefits of speed limiters against costs and feasibility for diverse fleets.

Prefers more evidence, phased approaches, and targeted exemptions rather than a permanent broad prohibition.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive.

Frames the bill as limiting federal overreach, protecting trucking industry costs, and preserving operational flexibility for drivers and carriers.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Modest chance to pass a receptive House; significant Senate hurdles and likely stakeholder pushback make final enactment uncertain.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO/score or cost estimate included
  • Extent of industry support or opposition is not specified
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress safety and emissions benefits of speed limiters

Modest chance to pass a receptive House; significant Senate hurdles and likely stakeholder pushback make final enactment uncertain.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive policy measure that plainly prohibits the FMCSA Administrator from issuing rules requiring speed limiting devices on interstate vehicles over…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis