Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in e…
The bill bars impoundment, transfer, or reprogramming of discretionary funds made available for the National Weather Service and the Great Lakes region unless a later statute explicitly authorizes such action by name.
It requires the NOAA Administrator to certify compliance within 30 days of enactment and annually thereafter to five specified congressional committees.
Content is narrow and non-controversial but constrains executive discretion; passage hinges on congressional priorities and Senate procedure.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive constraint on the executive branch's handling of specified NOAA funds, clearly stating the prohibition and establishing a minimal certification requirement.
Liberals emphasize protecting services; conservatives emphasize executive flexibility.
Liberals emphasize protecting services; conservatives emphasize executive flexibility.
Likely supportive: the bill protects funding for weather services and Great Lakes programs from administrative diversion.
It is seen as an accountability measure preserving service delivery and environmental monitoring.
Generally favorable but cautious: the bill secures funding for core services while reducing the executive branch’s flexibility to respond to changing priorities.
Support hinges on preserves for true emergencies and clarity on implementation.
Skeptical or opposed: the bill constrains executive branch flexibility and ties the administration’s hands on budget management.
Some conservatives may support protecting weather services, but many will object to statutory restrictions on reprogramming.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and non-controversial but constrains executive discretion; passage hinges on congressional priorities and Senate procedure.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize protecting services; conservatives emphasize executive flexibility.
Content is narrow and non-controversial but constrains executive discretion; passage hinges on congressional priorities and Senate procedur…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive constraint on the executive branch's handling of specified NOAA funds, clearly stating the prohibition and establishing a minimal certificati…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.