H.R. 3028 (119th)Bill Overview

Duty Drawback Clarification Act

Foreign Trade and International Finance|Foreign Trade and International Finance
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends Chapter 22 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to create a single 8-digit subheading, 2208.30.00, for all whiskies and to assign statistical 4-digit suffixes distinguishing whiskey types and container sizes.

It lists the article description as “Whiskies” and instructs the U.S. International Trade Commission to add eight statistical suffixes (Irish/Scotch, Bourbon, Rye, Other; each for containers ≤4L and >4L).

The amendments apply to goods entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption 15 days after enactment.

Passage35/100

Narrow, technical change reduces barriers, but tariff revenue impact and potential industry opposition create moderate uncertainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped, technically specific HTSUS amendment that is well-specified in statutory text and effective date but omits fiscal, definitional, and operational detail that would improve implementation certainty.

Contention52/100

Liberals focus on revenue loss and industry favoritism risks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersConsumers
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersSimplifies customs classification, likely reducing misclassification disputes and appeals.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a predictable, uniform duty rate that can simplify importer cost forecasting.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAdds statistical suffixes improving trade data granularity for policymakers and industry analysts.
Likely burdened
  • ConsumersMay raise duties on some imported whiskies, potentially increasing consumer retail prices.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReclassification and duty changes could reduce certain import volumes, affecting related jobs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImporters, brokers, and Customs will face administrative and IT update costs to implement changes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals focus on revenue loss and industry favoritism risks
Progressive45%

Likely sees the bill as a narrow technical change with limited social policy impact.

Concern will center on potential revenue loss, favoring large producers, and lack of safeguards for small distillers and public health considerations.

Split reaction
Centrist70%

Views the bill as a technical, pragmatic fix to classification and administrative clarity.

Will seek fiscal estimates and assurance that it won't create unintended revenue losses or competitive imbalances.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Sees this as a small deregulatory, pro-business clarification that simplifies trade compliance for an important industry.

Likely supportive if it reduces administrative burdens and fosters trade.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Narrow, technical change reduces barriers, but tariff revenue impact and potential industry opposition create moderate uncertainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or revenue estimate included
  • Exact meaning of 'Free $2.04/pf liter' is ambiguous in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals focus on revenue loss and industry favoritism risks

Narrow, technical change reduces barriers, but tariff revenue impact and potential industry opposition create moderate uncertainty.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped, technically specific HTSUS amendment that is well-specified in statutory text and effective date but omits fiscal, definitional, and operational…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis