- Targeted stakeholdersMay increase funding per project, enabling larger or more numerous restoration projects.
- Targeted stakeholdersLikely creates additional forest management and restoration jobs through expanded project activity.
- Targeted stakeholdersExpands projects that protect watersheds and drinking water sources, improving water-supply resilience.
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Reauthorization Act of 2025
Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…
This bill amends the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) authority in the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize and update the program.
Key changes include new monitoring and staffing requirements, expanded eligible project types (cross-boundary work, wildland-urban interface, watershed/drinking water), authorization of innovative implementation mechanisms (conservation finance, good neighbor agreements), an increase of a statutory $4,000,000 figure to $8,000,000, and an apparent extension of the program authorization to 2034.
Several textual edits add conflict resolution/collaborative governance and standardized monitoring language.
Narrow, technical reauthorization with modest fiscal impact and cross-party appeal makes enactment plausible absent external political obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused authorization amendment that reauthorizes and modifies the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program through targeted statutory changes (eligibility criteria, monitoring, staffing plan, and funding/authorization period adjustments). Its construction is generally consistent with an authorization-level substantive policy change.
Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and worry about commercialization.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesIncreases federal spending obligations and long‑term fiscal commitments for the program.
- Targeted stakeholdersExpanded active management could increase timber removal or biomass use, affecting some habitats.
- Federal agenciesGreater federal staffing and program involvement may create jurisdictional frictions with State or Tribal authorities.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and worry about commercialization.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill renews and strengthens collaborative restoration, monitoring, and watershed protections.
They will welcome cross-boundary and wildland-urban interface focus but be cautious about expanded financing mechanisms that could prioritize commercial interests.
Generally supportive but pragmatic; appreciates reauthorization, stronger monitoring, and broader project scope while wanting clear cost controls, measurable outcomes, and defined federal support roles.
Will look for stronger clarity on funding mechanics and oversight.
Cautiously favorable toward active forest management, wildfire risk reduction, and use of good neighbor agreements.
Skeptical of expanded federal roles, new staffing, and higher statutory spending unless paired with safeguards, state/Tribal control, and private leverage.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, technical reauthorization with modest fiscal impact and cross-party appeal makes enactment plausible absent external political obstacles.
- No CBO cost estimate included in text
- Committee priorities and legislative calendar timing
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and worry about commercialization.
Narrow, technical reauthorization with modest fiscal impact and cross-party appeal makes enactment plausible absent external political obst…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused authorization amendment that reauthorizes and modifies the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program through targeted statutory changes (eligibi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.