Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each c…
The Real Education and Access for Healthy Youth Act of 2025 authorizes competitive 5-year grants to support evidence-informed, comprehensive sex education and youth-friendly sexual health services for ages 10–29.
It funds K–12, higher education, educator training, and service delivery with priority to underserved populations, requires reporting and a multi-year independent evaluation, prohibits discrimination and use of funds for medically inaccurate or exclusionary programs, and authorizes $100 million per year for FY2026–2031 while repealing and redirecting prior abstinence-only-until-marriage funding.
Modest funding and administrative focus help, but high ideological salience, controversy on gender/race topics, and likely state pushback lower overall chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive authorization that establishes competitive grant programs, appropriations, statutory definitions, program priorities, reporting, and an independent evaluation, and it integrates changes into existing statutory frameworks.
Scope of federal role in local curricula and schools
Scope of federal role in local curricula and schools
Strongly supportive.
The bill funds comprehensive, inclusive, and culturally responsive sex education and redirects abstinence-only funds toward evidence-based programs.
It targets underserved communities and mandates evaluation and nondiscrimination.
Cautiously supportive.
Sees merit in evidence-based education, targeted services, and evaluation, but wants clear guardrails on federal involvement, costs, and community input to limit local disruption.
Likely opposed.
Views the bill as federal expansion into local education, funding for programs that include gender identity and contraception, and an erosion of abstinence-focused policy and parental rights.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest funding and administrative focus help, but high ideological salience, controversy on gender/race topics, and likely state pushback lower overall chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Scope of federal role in local curricula and schools
Modest funding and administrative focus help, but high ideological salience, controversy on gender/race topics, and likely state pushback l…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive authorization that establishes competitive grant programs, appropriations, statutory definitions, program priorities, reporting, and a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.