Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…
The bill amends the Healthy Forests Restoration Act to allow private and other non-Federal entities to propose stewardship contracts for hazardous-fuels removal, adds procedural requirements (annual notice, 120-day response, environmental review timing), requires at least 10% salvage material removal in projects, and prohibits work in Wilderness and inventoried roadless areas.
It directs the Comptroller General to report within five years on proposals, contracts, and acres treated.
The bill also raises the National Forest Management Act threshold for advertised timber sales from $10,000 to $55,000 and requires annual CPI adjustments.
Narrow, implementable reforms improve manageability but provoke environmental scrutiny; moderate bipartisan appeal tempered by procedural hurdles in the Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides clear statutory edits that concretely change contracting authorities and thresholds, with reasonable operational detail and a mandated 5-year GAO report, but it omits fiscal authorizations and several procedural specifics that would further support implementation and oversight.
Liberals worry privatization/commercial logging; conservatives emphasize efficiency.
Liberals worry privatization/commercial logging; conservatives emphasize efficiency.
Cautious support for improved wildfire fuels work but wary of expanding private-sector contracts on public lands.
Concerned that commercial logging could be disguised as 'hazard removal' and that procedural timelines may weaken environmental oversight.
Generally favorable, seeing the bill as pragmatic steps to speed hazardous-fuels work and reduce outdated administrative burdens, while adding measurable accountability.
Wants clearer safeguards and predictable implementation details.
Supportive: advances private-sector solutions, reduces bureaucratic delays, and updates an outdated advertising threshold.
Sees the bill as empowering local actors to address wildfire risks efficiently.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, implementable reforms improve manageability but provoke environmental scrutiny; moderate bipartisan appeal tempered by procedural hurdles in the Senate.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals worry privatization/commercial logging; conservatives emphasize efficiency.
Narrow, implementable reforms improve manageability but provoke environmental scrutiny; moderate bipartisan appeal tempered by procedural h…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides clear statutory edits that concretely change contracting authorities and thresholds, with reasonable operational detail and a mandated 5-year GAO report, but…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.