Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 0.
The bill directs the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere (NOAA) to carry out a project to improve forecasts of coastal marine fog.
It sets goals to increase marine-based observations, advance fog modeling and geographic coverage, improve NOAA advisories and decision-support services, and engage stakeholders including Tribes.
The Under Secretary must produce a project plan within one year detailing activities, resources, and timelines.
Content is narrow, technical, and broadly uncontroversial; success depends on funding inclusion and legislative scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a focused study/project directive with clear goals and specific technical emphases, requires stakeholder and tribal engagement, and sets a one-year deadline for a project plan, but it leaves key execution details—funding, implementation milestones, performance metrics, and reporting/oversight—largely unspecified.
Concerns over funding and potential unfunded mandate versus safety gains
Concerns over funding and potential unfunded mandate versus safety gains
Generally supportive because the bill aims to protect public safety, support coastal communities, and expand observational science.
Would press for open data, meaningful Tribal consultation, public access to results, and adequate federal funding.
May be cautious about commercial data use and environmental impacts of new platforms.
Cautiously favorable: the bill targets a concrete safety and economic problem with technical solutions.
Wants clarity on costs, milestones, and coordination with existing NOAA programs to avoid duplication.
Likely to support if plan includes measurable outcomes and realistic budgeting.
Mildly supportive if limited in cost and scope: the bill addresses maritime safety and commerce interests.
Concerned about new federal projects without funding and possible expansion of federal bureaucracy.
Prefers private-sector partnerships and cost-effective implementation.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow, technical, and broadly uncontroversial; success depends on funding inclusion and legislative scheduling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Concerns over funding and potential unfunded mandate versus safety gains
Content is narrow, technical, and broadly uncontroversial; success depends on funding inclusion and legislative scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a focused study/project directive with clear goals and specific technical emphases, requires stakeholder and tribal engagement, and sets a one-year deadli…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.