- Federal agenciesProvides lawful permanent residence to Dr. Yue‑Cheng Yang, enabling work authorization and access to federal benefits.
- StatesWaives specified inadmissibility and removal grounds reflected in DHS or State records as of enactment.
- Targeted stakeholdersRequires rescission of any outstanding removal or inadmissibility orders against Dr. Yang.
For the relief of Dr. Yue-Cheng Yang.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This private bill grants Dr.
Yue-Cheng Yang eligibility to receive an immigrant visa or to adjust to lawful permanent resident status despite certain Immigration and Nationality Act provisions.
It waives removal and inadmissibility grounds reflected in DHS or State Department records, requires DHS to rescind existing orders, allows two years to file with fees, and reduces the applicable country visa category by one upon granting.
Very narrow, low-cost relief increases chance, but individual immigration waivers attract scrutiny and have limited legislative priority.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive change that is clearly focused and legally specific. It provides concrete statutory instructions to relevant agencies and integrates with existing immigration statutes.
Appropriateness of Congress granting individual immigration exceptions
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersCreates case‑specific immigration relief outside normal administrative adjudication, raising fairness concerns for othe…
- Targeted stakeholdersEstablishes a legislative precedent for private immigration bills, potentially increasing future congressional workload.
- Targeted stakeholdersOverrides immigration enforcement determinations, which could be viewed as inconsistent with enforcement objectives.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Appropriateness of Congress granting individual immigration exceptions
Likely supportive as a narrowly targeted humanitarian or corrective measure that regularizes an individual's status.
Views the waiver and rescission as necessary to prevent ongoing hardship for one person.
Cautiously favorable if the case is justified, since the bill is narrowly focused and administrative costs are minimal.
Wants clear factual justification and documentation before endorsing legislative exception.
Likely skeptical or opposed because it overrides statutory immigration grounds and rescinds removal orders by Congress.
Views this as an unacceptable circumvention of enforcement and adjudication procedures.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow, low-cost relief increases chance, but individual immigration waivers attract scrutiny and have limited legislative priority.
- Contents of DHS and State Department records concerning the beneficiary
- Any criminal or national-security issues not disclosed in bill text
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Appropriateness of Congress granting individual immigration exceptions
Very narrow, low-cost relief increases chance, but individual immigration waivers attract scrutiny and have limited legislative priority.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive change that is clearly focused and legally specific. It provides concrete statutory instructions to relevant agencies and integrate…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.