H.R. 7639 (119th)Bill Overview

For the relief of Roberto Carlos Lopez.

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Feb 20, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This private bill grants Roberto Carlos Lopez eligibility for an immigrant visa or adjustment to lawful permanent resident status, waives grounds of removal or inadmissibility reflected in DHS/State records, and requires rescission of any removal orders.

It conditions filing within two years, reduces the applicable immigrant visa number by one, and bars certain family-preference immigration benefits for his parents, brothers, and sisters.

Passage30/100

Low substantive controversy but private, single-person relief historically has low legislative priority and faces procedural hurdles.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive policy change (private relief) that is legally specific and integrates cleanly with the Immigration and Nationality Act, providing explicit statutory overrides, deadlines, and agency directives to effect the relief requested for a named individual.

Contention60/100

Left/center accept narrow humanitarian relief; right opposes waiver of enforcement

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Immigrants
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides permanent residency and work authorization for the named individual, ending his removal risk.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRescinding orders resolves this case, potentially reducing ongoing immigration enforcement costs for this individual.
  • Federal agenciesLegal status likely enables the individual to participate fully in the workforce and pay federal and state taxes.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a case-specific congressional exemption, which critics may view as circumventing standard immigration procedure…
  • Federal agenciesRequires DHS and State Department administrative actions and rescissions, increasing agency workload and processing tas…
  • ImmigrantsReduces the nation's immigrant visa supply by one for the individual's birth country, slightly affecting visa availabil…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left/center accept narrow humanitarian relief; right opposes waiver of enforcement
Progressive80%

Likely supportive if the bill remedies an unjust or humanitarian situation for an individual.

Views congressional relief for a named individual as appropriate in narrow, documented hardship cases but notes family-reunification limits.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally supportive if the case is compelling and narrowly tailored.

Sees this as standard congressional relief but emphasizes procedural fairness, limited precedent, and basic vetting.

Split reaction
Conservative15%

Likely opposed because the bill waives statutory grounds and rescinds removal orders, seen as undermining immigration enforcement and incentives for compliance.

Views congressional exceptions skeptically.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Low substantive controversy but private, single-person relief historically has low legislative priority and faces procedural hurdles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No legislative cost estimate included
  • Underlying facts supporting relief are not in the text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left/center accept narrow humanitarian relief; right opposes waiver of enforcement

Low substantive controversy but private, single-person relief historically has low legislative priority and faces procedural hurdles.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive policy change (private relief) that is legally specific and integrates cleanly with the Immigration and Nationality Act, providing…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis