Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 201 East Grant Avenue in Georgetown, Ohio, as the "Ulysses S.
Grant Post Office Building." It directs that any federal references to that facility use the new name.
The measure is an honorary renaming and does not appropriate funds or change USPS operations.
Low-cost, narrow ceremonial bill with little controversy historically; passes routinely absent procedural objections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is clear, narrowly focused, and legally straightforward. It provides the core statutory instruction (the designation) and a references clause to integrate the new name with existing records.
Extent to contextualize Grant's full historical record
Extent to contextualize Grant's full historical record
Likely supportive as a low-cost recognition of a historical figure who helped preserve the Union and supported Reconstruction-era civil rights.
Might note complexity in Grant's record and prefer contextualizing his legacy.
Generally supportive because it is a routine, noncontroversial honorary naming with minimal fiscal impact.
Would look for clarity that the rename imposes no operational or budgetary burdens on USPS.
Likely supportive as a patriotic recognition of a U.S. president and Civil War general.
May emphasize local decision-making and minimal federal cost, while some could question federal naming proliferation.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, narrow ceremonial bill with little controversy historically; passes routinely absent procedural objections.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Extent to contextualize Grant's full historical record
Low-cost, narrow ceremonial bill with little controversy historically; passes routinely absent procedural objections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is clear, narrowly focused, and legally straightforward. It provides the core statutory instruction (the designation) and a references clause to integrate the new nam…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.