H.R. 7813 (119th)Bill Overview

NOAA Weather Radio Modernization Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Atmospheric science and weatherBroadcasting, cable, digital technologies
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 5, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill adds a new Title VII to the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 creating a nationwide NOAA Weather Radio program, requires a modernization and expansion initiative, and mandates assessments, standards development for flash-flood alerting, staffing classifications and plans, and a direct-hire authority to fill critical National Weather Service positions.

It authorizes $100 million (FY2026, one-time) for modernization and assessment and $20 million annually (FY2026–2031) for operations.

It also directs NIST (in consultation with NOAA) to support flash-flood alert standards for 100-year floodplains and requires reports and timelines for staffing assessments and a five-year personnel plan.

Passage70/100

Technocratic, narrowly scoped modernization with modest funding and clear implementation steps fits patterns of bills that can become law, but final approval depends on appropriations and floor scheduling.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is generally well-constructed: it clearly assigns responsibilities, prescribes a set of modernization activities, requires assessments and plans with deadlines, and authorizes appropriations. It also integrates with existing law and addresses several resilience and edge-case considerations.

Contention55/100

Funding scale: left wants more, conservatives worry about added spending

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersImproves hazard warning reach and timeliness for tornadoes, flash floods, and other short‑fuse threats.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAuthorizes approximately $220 million for operations and modernization through 2031.
  • Local governmentsPrioritizes coverage expansion for broadband‑underserved and high‑risk communities lacking local alert systems.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesOne‑time and recurring authorizations increase federal spending obligations with uncertain future appropriations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReclassifying certain positions as protective service may change pay, hiring rules, and bargaining implications.
  • Targeted stakeholdersDirect hire authority bypasses competitive hiring rules, raising transparency and workforce‑protection concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Funding scale: left wants more, conservatives worry about added spending
Progressive80%

Likely generally supportive because the bill invests in public-safety communications, resilience, and coverage for underserved areas.

Would want stronger guarantees for funding, equitable service to broadband-poor communities, labor protections, and safeguards against privatizing core functions.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Cautiously favorable: it addresses clear public-safety needs and operational gaps while creating oversight milestones.

Supports modernization but seeks cost controls, measurable performance metrics, and accountable implementation.

Leans supportive
Conservative45%

Mixed to skeptical: supports improved emergency communications and resilience, but worries about added federal spending, expanded federal workforce classifications, and potential federal overreach in land/tower priorities or partnerships.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Technocratic, narrowly scoped modernization with modest funding and clear implementation steps fits patterns of bills that can become law, but final approval depends on appropriations and floor scheduling.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Whether Congress will appropriate the authorized funds
  • Stakeholder reaction to employee reclassification impacts
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Funding scale: left wants more, conservatives worry about added spending

Technocratic, narrowly scoped modernization with modest funding and clear implementation steps fits patterns of bills that can become law,…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is generally well-constructed: it clearly assigns responsibilities, prescribes a set of modernization activities, requires assessm…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis