H.R. 7872 (119th)Bill Overview

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to provide for the payment of bonus payments of certain coal leases issued under that Act.

Energy|Energy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Amends the Mineral Leasing Act to require that bonus payments for certain coal leases issued under a deferred bonus payment system be paid in 10 equal annual installments, with the first installment submitted with the bid.

Passage40/100

Technically narrow and administrable but politically sensitive subject and absent offsets reduce prospects, especially in a closely divided chamber.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that prescribes a 10‑year installment schedule for certain deferred coal lease bonus payments. It succeeds in specifying the basic payment mechanism but omits many implementation, fiscal, and enforcement details that would typically accompany a substantive change affecting federal receipts and leasing operations.

Contention68/100

Climate impact versus support for domestic coal industry

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Developers
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a predictable, uniform ten-year payment schedule for deferred bonus payments.
  • Federal agenciesEnsures an immediate initial cash payment to the federal government with each bid.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay reduce payment default risk by requiring the first installment upon bidding.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersHigher upfront cost may deter smaller companies from bidding, reducing competition.
  • Federal agenciesFewer or lower bids could reduce total federal receipts from coal leasing.
  • DevelopersIncreased capital requirements could raise project financing costs for coal developers.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Climate impact versus support for domestic coal industry
Progressive20%

Sees the bill as a narrow change that nonetheless makes coal leasing more administratively favorable.

Likely views it as encouraging continued fossil fuel extraction and undermining climate and clean energy goals.

Considers potential local job arguments but remains skeptical given climate harms.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Views the bill as a technical, narrowly targeted fiscal change with both pros and cons.

Appreciates administrative predictability but worries about delayed receipts and potential moral hazard.

Wants safeguards like surety, fiscal estimates, and environmental compliance.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely favors the bill as pro-energy, pro-industry reform that reduces upfront barriers and supports domestic coal production and jobs.

Sees it as a limited deregulatory, market-friendly tweak without broad new regulatory burdens.

Wants implementation to avoid additional constraints.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Technically narrow and administrable but politically sensitive subject and absent offsets reduce prospects, especially in a closely divided chamber.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office cost estimate provided
  • Extent of committee or floor support unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Climate impact versus support for domestic coal industry

Technically narrow and administrable but politically sensitive subject and absent offsets reduce prospects, especially in a closely divided…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that prescribes a 10‑year installment schedule for certain deferred coal lease bonus payments. It succeeds in specifying the basic pa…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis