H.R. 8013 (119th)Bill Overview

Keep Innovators in America Act

Immigration|Immigration
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Mar 19, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to codify that an F‑1 student’s course of study may include practical training and employment authorization under DHS terms, including post‑completion work related to the field of study.

It also allows an F‑1 student to maintain student status while being the beneficiary of a pending or approved petition under section 204(a)(1), and requires the enrolled student’s course of study to be consistent with section 214(m).

Passage45/100

Content is narrow and administratively oriented which helps, but immigration work‑authorization is politically sensitive and could attract amendments or opposition.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that codifies permissive practical training and post-completion employment authorization for F-1 students and allows maintenance of student status in specified petition circumstances. It clearly locates the change within the INA and delegates operational detail to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize retention and competitiveness benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Workers · StudentsWorkers
Likely helped
  • WorkersIncreased retention of international graduates leading to more skilled workers for U.S. employers.
  • StudentsGreater legal certainty for universities, employers, and students by codifying OPT, reducing regulatory uncertainty.
  • Targeted stakeholdersPotential economic growth and additional tax revenue from employed graduates retained in the U.S.
Likely burdened
  • WorkersCould increase labor market competition, potentially affecting domestic workers' job prospects.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay exert downward pressure on wages in affected entry-level occupations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersGrants DHS broad discretion, possibly creating regulatory complexity and variable implementation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize retention and competitiveness benefits.
Progressive75%

Likely to view the bill positively as a straightforward protection for international students and high‑skilled talent.

Sees codification of practical training and status protections as improving stability and competitiveness for immigrant students.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Likely cautiously supportive as a clarifying, administrative change that stabilizes OPT while seeking clear DHS implementation.

Would want technical details on scope, enforcement, and labor market impacts.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Likely skeptical or opposed, concerned the bill expands foreign worker access and circumvents immigration controls.

May accept talent retention but wants stronger limits and protections for U.S. workers.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Content is narrow and administratively oriented which helps, but immigration work‑authorization is politically sensitive and could attract amendments or opposition.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score in bill text
  • How DHS will implement or constrain authorization terms
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize retention and competitiveness benefits.

Content is narrow and administratively oriented which helps, but immigration work‑authorization is politically sensitive and could attract…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory amendment that codifies permissive practical training and post-completion employment authorization for F-1 students and allows maintenance of s…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis