- WorkersProvides employers a tax credit incentivizing wage increases for child care workers.
- WorkersMay improve worker retention and care quality by making child care jobs more sustainable.
- Targeted stakeholdersSets a higher 7% credit rate for rural facilities, directing additional support to non-urban areas.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit for increasing wages paid to child care providers.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Creates a new tax credit (section 45BB) for employers who increase wages paid to child care workers.
The credit equals the lesser of an applicable percentage (5% generally; 7% in rural areas) of qualified child care wages or the year-over-year increase in those wages, and requires an increase in average hourly child care wages to qualify.
Defines qualified workers, wages, and eligible child care facilities (at least six children, receives payment, complies with laws).
Modest, targeted incentive with bipartisan potential but constrained by revenue impact, procedural hurdles, and need for scoring/offsets.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a new employer tax credit to incentivize increased wages for child care providers, with specific formulaic provisions and statutory definitions and with appropriate linkages into existing tax-credit machinery. It lacks fiscal exposition, some administrative detail, and explicit safeguards against foreseeable gaming or edge cases.
Liberals emphasize workforce pay and care quality improvements.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesGenerates federal revenue losses from a new tax credit, increasing budgetary costs.
- EmployersCreates compliance burdens for employers to track hours, wages, and year-over-year average calculations.
- Targeted stakeholdersExcludes very small or informal providers, limiting benefits to licensed facilities serving at least six children.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals emphasize workforce pay and care quality improvements.
Likely supportive because the bill directly targets higher wages for child care workers and aims to strengthen the child care workforce.
Views the rural bonus positively but may see the credit percentage as too small to meet living-wage goals.
Sees employer-focused incentive as acceptable but would prefer broader measures or direct public investment.
Views the bill as a pragmatic, modest incentive to encourage wage increases in the child care sector while limiting federal outlays.
Appraises the rural differential and the year-over-year requirement as sensible controls.
Wants clearer cost estimates and guardrails against unintended windfalls.
Skeptical of expanding tax-code incentives that subsidize employers and add complexity.
Prefers market-driven wage adjustments and state or private solutions.
May accept employer-focused incentives over direct spending, but generally wants tighter limits and fiscal offsets.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, targeted incentive with bipartisan potential but constrained by revenue impact, procedural hurdles, and need for scoring/offsets.
- Absence of CBO/score and estimated fiscal cost
- Whether credit is refundable in practice via section 6417 mechanics
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals emphasize workforce pay and care quality improvements.
Modest, targeted incentive with bipartisan potential but constrained by revenue impact, procedural hurdles, and need for scoring/offsets.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a new employer tax credit to incentivize increased wages for child care providers, with specific formulaic provisions and statutory definitions an…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.