H.R. 8023 (119th)Bill Overview

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit for increasing wages paid to child care providers.

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 19, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Creates a new tax credit (section 45BB) for employers who increase wages paid to child care workers.

The credit equals the lesser of an applicable percentage (5% generally; 7% in rural areas) of qualified child care wages or the year-over-year increase in those wages, and requires an increase in average hourly child care wages to qualify.

Defines qualified workers, wages, and eligible child care facilities (at least six children, receives payment, complies with laws).

Passage45/100

Modest, targeted incentive with bipartisan potential but constrained by revenue impact, procedural hurdles, and need for scoring/offsets.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a new employer tax credit to incentivize increased wages for child care providers, with specific formulaic provisions and statutory definitions and with appropriate linkages into existing tax-credit machinery. It lacks fiscal exposition, some administrative detail, and explicit safeguards against foreseeable gaming or edge cases.

Contention58/100

Liberals emphasize workforce pay and care quality improvements.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
WorkersFederal agencies · Employers
Likely helped
  • WorkersProvides employers a tax credit incentivizing wage increases for child care workers.
  • WorkersMay improve worker retention and care quality by making child care jobs more sustainable.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSets a higher 7% credit rate for rural facilities, directing additional support to non-urban areas.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesGenerates federal revenue losses from a new tax credit, increasing budgetary costs.
  • EmployersCreates compliance burdens for employers to track hours, wages, and year-over-year average calculations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExcludes very small or informal providers, limiting benefits to licensed facilities serving at least six children.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize workforce pay and care quality improvements.
Progressive85%

Likely supportive because the bill directly targets higher wages for child care workers and aims to strengthen the child care workforce.

Views the rural bonus positively but may see the credit percentage as too small to meet living-wage goals.

Sees employer-focused incentive as acceptable but would prefer broader measures or direct public investment.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Views the bill as a pragmatic, modest incentive to encourage wage increases in the child care sector while limiting federal outlays.

Appraises the rural differential and the year-over-year requirement as sensible controls.

Wants clearer cost estimates and guardrails against unintended windfalls.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical of expanding tax-code incentives that subsidize employers and add complexity.

Prefers market-driven wage adjustments and state or private solutions.

May accept employer-focused incentives over direct spending, but generally wants tighter limits and fiscal offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Modest, targeted incentive with bipartisan potential but constrained by revenue impact, procedural hurdles, and need for scoring/offsets.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absence of CBO/score and estimated fiscal cost
  • Whether credit is refundable in practice via section 6417 mechanics
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize workforce pay and care quality improvements.

Modest, targeted incentive with bipartisan potential but constrained by revenue impact, procedural hurdles, and need for scoring/offsets.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a new employer tax credit to incentivize increased wages for child care providers, with specific formulaic provisions and statutory definitions an…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis