H.R. 8213 (119th)Bill Overview

Defending Women in the Workplace Act

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues|Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to state that the phrases "because of sex" and "on the basis of sex" do not include "gender identity." In short, it seeks to exclude gender identity from the federal statutory definition of sex discrimination under Title VII.

Passage20/100

Technically narrow but touches a polarizing civil-rights area, lacks compromise features, and faces strong opposition and likely legal scrutiny.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear, narrowly focused textual rule of construction amending the meaning of 'because of sex' and 'on the basis of sex' under Title VII, but it is mechanically sparse.

Contention75/100

Whether the bill protects women's sex-based interests or permits anti-trans discrimination.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
EmployersFederal agencies · Workers
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersClarifies that sex-based legal protections remain focused on biological sex distinctions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSupports proponents' aims to preserve single-sex policies in some programs and facilities.
  • EmployersReduces perceived regulatory uncertainty for employers about sex-based workplace rules.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRemoves federal employment protections for transgender and gender‑diverse employees under Title VII.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates legal conflict with the Supreme Court's prior interpretation of Title VII scope.
  • WorkersMay increase workplace discrimination and harassment risks for gender‑diverse workers.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether the bill protects women's sex-based interests or permits anti-trans discrimination.
Progressive5%

Likely views the bill as a rollback of employment protections for transgender people and a narrowing of civil‑rights statutory coverage.

Sees risks to workplace equality, privacy, and public health for a vulnerable group.

Likely resistant
Centrist40%

Approaches the bill as a clarity-seeking statutory change with significant tradeoffs.

Appreciates clearer rules for employers but worries about compatibility with existing Supreme Court rulings and harms to a marginalized group.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supports the bill as restoring or preserving sex-based distinctions and protecting women's spaces and programs.

Sees it as a restrained legislative correction limiting federal overreach into sex-defined policies.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood20/100

Technically narrow but touches a polarizing civil-rights area, lacks compromise features, and faces strong opposition and likely legal scrutiny.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Committee action and floor scheduling timeline
  • Likelihood and outcome of judicial challenges
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether the bill protects women's sex-based interests or permits anti-trans discrimination.

Technically narrow but touches a polarizing civil-rights area, lacks compromise features, and faces strong opposition and likely legal scru…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear, narrowly focused textual rule of construction amending the meaning of 'because of sex' and 'on the basis of sex' under Title VII, but it is mechanic…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis