H.R. 8228 (119th)Bill Overview

To nullify the Presidential Proclamation relating to Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge to Address Fundamental International Payments Problems, and for other purposes.

Foreign Trade and International Finance|Foreign Trade and International Finance
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill nullifies Presidential Proclamation 11012 (Feb 20, 2026) and any substantially similar proclamation imposing a temporary import surcharge.

It bars federal funds from implementing such a proclamation and directs the President to refund tariffs or duties collected between February 20, 2026 and enactment of this Act.

Passage30/100

Narrow and clear but reverses executive trade action and mandates retroactive refunds—likely to face political opposition, procedural hurdles, and possible veto.

CredibilityMisaligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly and directly accomplishes a narrow substantive objective—nullifying a specific Presidential Proclamation and directing refund of duties collected under it—but it is lean on implementation details that would be necessary to operationalize that objective.

Contention70/100

Left emphasizes consumer protection and congressional authority

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
ConsumersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • ConsumersPrevents additional import surcharges, limiting immediate price increases for consumers and downstream businesses.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAvoids new compliance and administrative costs for importers and customs brokers.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReasserts Congress's control over tariff policy and limits executive imposition of trade surcharges.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersRemoves an executive tool designed to address urgent international paymentsimbalances and cross-border financial strain…
  • Targeted stakeholdersLimits the President's flexibility to impose temporary measures in fast-moving international economic crises.
  • Federal agenciesRetroactive refunds would reduce federal tariff receipts and could worsen the fiscal balance.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes consumer protection and congressional authority
Progressive85%

Likely supportive.

The bill rescinds a presidential import surcharge, protects consumers from tariff-driven price increases, and reasserts Congressional control over trade measures.

It also requires refunds for duties already collected.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously favorable but concerned.

The bill corrects a unilateral surcharge but raises questions about removing executive flexibility.

Centrists will want clear procedures, cost estimates, and replacement tools through legislative process.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed.

The bill removes an executive economic tool used to address international payments or currency issues and mandates refunds, which conservatives view as undermining leverage and encouraging foreign noncompliance.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow and clear but reverses executive trade action and mandates retroactive refunds—likely to face political opposition, procedural hurdles, and possible veto.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Estimated fiscal cost of required refunds is not provided
  • Whether the President would sign or veto the bill
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes consumer protection and congressional authority

Narrow and clear but reverses executive trade action and mandates retroactive refunds—likely to face political opposition, procedural hurdl…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly and directly accomplishes a narrow substantive objective—nullifying a specific Presidential Proclamation and directing refund of duties collected under it—…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis