Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
The bill requires the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research, coordinated with Commerce and the Director of National Intelligence, to produce a comprehensive report within 360 days on the impact and effectiveness of U.S. semiconductor and semiconductor manufacturing equipment export controls on the People’s Republic of China.
The report must inventory controls, classify their type and multilateral status, analyze quantitative effects on PRC military, semiconductor industry, AI capabilities, and U.S. industry, assess foreign availability, identify successful or failed controls, recommend refinements and enforcement steps, engage stakeholders, and be published unclassified with a possible classified annex.
Technocratic, low‑cost oversight bill has bipartisan potential but many standalone reporting bills stall before enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting requirement that clearly identifies an executing office, interagency coordination partners, a firm deadline, detailed report contents, stakeholder engagement obligations, and public-posting expectations. It thereby provides a concrete mechanism to produce an accountable, public analysis of semiconductor export-control effectiveness.
Degree of public disclosure versus reliance on a classified annex
Degree of public disclosure versus reliance on a classified annex
Likely supportive because the bill demands transparent, data-driven evaluation of export controls and public disclosure.
They will welcome oversight that can expose ineffective controls harming U.S. industry and global supply chains, while also pushing for controls that limit PRC military and surveillance capabilities.
Generally favorable because it mandates an evidence-based, interagency review and congressional reporting.
They will appreciate the balance between public unclassified findings and a classified annex, while watching for clear metrics, costs, and timelines.
Supportive in principle because the bill focuses on strengthening U.S. national-security controls against the PRC and improving enforcement.
They will favor findings that identify gaps and recommend stronger enforcement, but worry public disclosure could weaken operational effectiveness.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, low‑cost oversight bill has bipartisan potential but many standalone reporting bills stall before enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Degree of public disclosure versus reliance on a classified annex
Technocratic, low‑cost oversight bill has bipartisan potential but many standalone reporting bills stall before enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified reporting requirement that clearly identifies an executing office, interagency coordination partners, a firm deadline, detailed report contents, s…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.