H.R. 8430 (119th)Bill Overview

Federal and State Food Safety Information Sharing Act of 2026

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 22, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to authorize the HHS Secretary to share unredacted FDA food-safety information with State, local, Tribal, and Territorial authorities.

It lists types of information eligible for sharing, sets timing and limited re‑disclosure rules, and preserves other confidentiality agreements.

Separately, it lengthens certain food-safety grant award periods from three to five years and makes continued funding contingent on a first-year program evaluation.

Passage55/100

Content is technical and broadly defensible for public health; confidentiality and stakeholder concerns create moderate uncertainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a substantive change to federal authority by adding a statutory authorization for FDA to share unredacted food safety information with State, local, Tribal, and Territorial authorities and by lengthening certain grant terms. The statutory amendments are explicit and integrated with existing FD&C Act provisions, but the bill leaves significant operational and resourcing details to implementation.

Contention52/100

Progressives emphasize public health gains and privacy safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsStates · Consumers
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesFaster identification and containment of foodborne outbreaks through timely federal-to-state information sharing.
  • Targeted stakeholdersImproved coordination for recalls and distribution list notifications reducing public exposure to contaminated products.
  • Local governmentsEnhanced state and local response capacity via access to laboratory, inspection, and complaint data.
Likely burdened
  • StatesRisk of disclosure of confidential business information and trade secrets to state authorities.
  • StatesPotential inconsistent state-level enforcement actions leading to varying requirements for food businesses across juris…
  • ConsumersBroader data sharing could raise consumer privacy concerns around complaint and surveillance data.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize public health gains and privacy safeguards
Progressive85%

Generally favorable: improved, faster data sharing should strengthen outbreak response and protect public health.

Will seek stronger privacy, Tribal consultation, and worker/consumer protections tied to implementation and funding.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Cautious support: the bill clarifies legal authority for information sharing and increases grant stability.

Prefers clearer definitions, oversight, and funding assurances to limit unintended consequences.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Skeptical: while state access to information can aid public health, the bill expands federal authority and risks disclosure of proprietary data.

Support conditional on stronger limits and protections.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Content is technical and broadly defensible for public health; confidentiality and stakeholder concerns create moderate uncertainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimate or appropriation details
  • Industry concerns over proprietary or personal data disclosure
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize public health gains and privacy safeguards

Content is technical and broadly defensible for public health; confidentiality and stakeholder concerns create moderate uncertainty.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a substantive change to federal authority by adding a statutory authorization for FDA to share unredacted food safety information with State, loca…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis