Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill amends Section 101 of division JJ of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 by replacing the existing statutory expiration date for certain regulations concerning the North Atlantic right whale with a later year (changing the year to 2035). In short, it extends the time period during which those specified whale-related regulations remain effective.
Environmental protection priority versus economic/regulatory burden concerns
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is narrowly focused and attempts a straightforward statutory amendment to extend the period for certain North Atlantic right whale regulations.
This bill amends Section 101 of division JJ of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 by replacing the existing statutory expiration date for certain regulations concerning the North Atlantic right whale with a later year (changing the year to 2035).
In short, it extends the time period during which those specified whale-related regulations remain effective.
The bill text is a single-year extension and does not list additional regulatory details within this amendment.
Targeted, low-cost extension has plausible path but may encounter regional stakeholder opposition and legislative calendar hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is narrowly focused and attempts a straightforward statutory amendment to extend the period for certain North Atlantic right whale regulations. The purpose is stated clearly, but the operative text as provided is ambiguous and lacks specificity on exactly what text is being replaced or how the change will be implemented and overseen.
Environmental protection priority versus economic/regulatory burden concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Environmental protection priority versus economic/regulatory burden concerns
Likely supportive: sees the extension as maintaining critical protections for an endangered species and preventing regulatory lapses that could harm recovery.
Would view continuity favorably while pressing for stronger action and monitoring where needed.
Cautiously supportive: values avoiding a lapse in existing protections and the regulatory certainty it provides, but wants assurances about economic impacts, transparent review, and sunset or performance metrics.
Likely skeptical or opposed: views the measure as an extension of federal regulations that impose costs on fishing and maritime industries, done without fresh review or economic analysis.
Prefers shorter timeframes or conditional extensions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, low-cost extension has plausible path but may encounter regional stakeholder opposition and legislative calendar hurdles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Environmental protection priority versus economic/regulatory burden concerns
Targeted, low-cost extension has plausible path but may encounter regional stakeholder opposition and legislative calendar hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is narrowly focused and attempts a straightforward statutory amendment to extend the period for certain North Atlantic right whale regulations. The purpose is stated…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.