Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Amends Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act to change eligibility and procedural rules for employment under subminimum-wage certificates. The bill adjusts age-related language, adds an explicit statement that an individual chooses such employment, permits an employer to document attempts to obtain mandatory counseling if the State fails to provide it, and requires sharing documentation with the employer when appropriate.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights harms and ending subminimum wages
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act intended to alter eligibility/exception criteria and documentation requirements related to employment of young adults with disabilities.
Amends Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act to change eligibility and procedural rules for employment under subminimum-wage certificates.
The bill adjusts age-related language, adds an explicit statement that an individual chooses such employment, permits an employer to document attempts to obtain mandatory counseling if the State fails to provide it, and requires sharing documentation with the employer when appropriate.
The changes apply to employment on or after enactment.
Technically narrow and low-cost but touches a contentious disability-employment issue with active advocacy groups; needs bipartisan support and Senate consensus.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act intended to alter eligibility/exception criteria and documentation requirements related to employment of young adults with disabilities. It identifies the statutory target and proposes concrete amendments but includes textual ambiguities and limited implementation, fiscal, and accountability details.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights harms and ending subminimum wages
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights harms and ending subminimum wages
Likely to view the bill skeptically because it preserves and potentially expands pathways for subminimum wages.
Concern will center on disability rights, integration into competitive employment, and potential for coercion despite added paperwork.
Support would be conditional and generally low.
Mixed view: appreciates honoring individual choice and reducing bureaucratic bottlenecks, but worries safeguards are insufficient to prevent exploitation.
Would seek clearer protections, oversight, and transparency before full endorsement.
Likely to view the bill favorably as restoring adult choice and reducing federal-state red tape.
Sees it as supporting providers and preserving employment opportunities for adults with disabilities who prefer sheltered or supported settings.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically narrow and low-cost but touches a contentious disability-employment issue with active advocacy groups; needs bipartisan support and Senate consensus.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights harms and ending subminimum wages
Technically narrow and low-cost but touches a contentious disability-employment issue with active advocacy groups; needs bipartisan support…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive amendment to section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act intended to alter eligibility/exception criteria and documentation requirements related to…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.