Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill creates a federal private right of action for a person who knowingly transmits an unsolicited intimate visual depiction to a recipient without that recipient’s consent. It defines covered images to include ‘‘intimate digital forgeries’’ (AI or altered images indistinguishable from authentic ones) and limits “transmit” to directly sending to one or more individuals, not publishing.
Liberal emphasizes victim protection and AI-deepfake coverage
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear federal private cause of action with targeted definitions and remedies, but provides only partial procedural and systemic detail needed for comprehensive operation and integration with existing legal frameworks.
The bill creates a federal private right of action for a person who knowingly transmits an unsolicited intimate visual depiction to a recipient without that recipient’s consent.
It defines covered images to include ‘‘intimate digital forgeries’’ (AI or altered images indistinguishable from authentic ones) and limits “transmit” to directly sending to one or more individuals, not publishing.
Remedies include up to $1,000 statutory damages or compensatory emotional-distress damages, attorney fees, and injunctions; guardians may sue for minors, who may use initials or pseudonyms.
Moderately scoped, sympathetic privacy goal increases prospects, but First Amendment concerns, potential litigation exposure, and need for cross‑chamber agreement reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear federal private cause of action with targeted definitions and remedies, but provides only partial procedural and systemic detail needed for comprehensive operation and integration with existing legal frameworks.
Liberal emphasizes victim protection and AI-deepfake coverage
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes victim protection and AI-deepfake coverage
Likely strongly supportive: protects victims of nonconsensual intimate-image sharing and covers AI-generated deepfakes.
Welcomes civil remedy, privacy protections for minors, and injunction authority.
Cautiously favorable: targeted civil remedy for nonconsensual transmissions while preserving First Amendment safeguards.
Wants clearer interplay with existing law and operational details.
Skeptical: concerned about free-speech implications and federal expansion into interpersonal communications.
Appreciates limited scope and civil (not criminal) approach but worries about vague standards.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Moderately scoped, sympathetic privacy goal increases prospects, but First Amendment concerns, potential litigation exposure, and need for cross‑chamber agreement reduce chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes victim protection and AI-deepfake coverage
Moderately scoped, sympathetic privacy goal increases prospects, but First Amendment concerns, potential litigation exposure, and need for…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear federal private cause of action with targeted definitions and remedies, but provides only partial procedural and systemic detail needed for compre…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.