H.R. 9171 (119th)Bill Overview

Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 5, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 599.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This is the Fiscal Year 2027 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill. It provides specific funding levels for DOI bureaus, Indian Affairs, wildland fire, EPA programs, and related accounts, and includes many policy riders restricting or directing agency rules, reissuances, and program authorities.

Why people may split

Progressives highlight riders that weaken Endangered Species Act protections.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this is a conventionally drafted, comprehensive annual appropriations measure that supplies detailed funding levels, availability periods, and many legislative riders affecting administration of programs and rules.

This is the Fiscal Year 2027 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill.

It provides specific funding levels for DOI bureaus, Indian Affairs, wildland fire, EPA programs, and related accounts, and includes many policy riders restricting or directing agency rules, reissuances, and program authorities.

Passage30/100

Standard appropriations funding improves baseline prospects, but numerous contentious riders and legal-change provisions substantially reduce overall enactability.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this is a conventionally drafted, comprehensive annual appropriations measure that supplies detailed funding levels, availability periods, and many legislative riders affecting administration of programs and rules. It integrates closely with existing law and provides the customary fiscal and administrative authorities expected in an appropriations act.

Contention70/100

Progressives highlight riders that weaken Endangered Species Act protections.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
SchoolsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFunds sustain staffing and operations across Interior bureaus, supporting ongoing public land and resource management.
  • Potential benefitLarge wildfire suppression and fuels management appropriations aim to reduce fire damages and protect communities.
  • SchoolsDedicated Tribal education, construction, and trust management funding supports school operations and infrastructure on…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesMultiple riders prohibit implementation of specific Endangered Species Act rules and direct delisting, reducing federal…
  • Federal agenciesRestrictions on agency use of social cost metrics and scientific assessment tools may limit climate and health-related…
  • Federal agenciesProhibitions on regulating lead ammunition on Federal lands constrain a federal conservation tool absent State approval.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives highlight riders that weaken Endangered Species Act protections.
Progressive20%

Generally critical.

While the bill funds conservation, tribes, and agency operations, numerous riders limit endangered species protections, block environmental rules, and constrain climate- and public‑land safeguards.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Mixed.

The bill funds core agency missions, tribal programs, and wildfire response, but contains numerous policy riders that constrain agency flexibility and raise governance and legal concerns.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Generally supportive.

The bill funds agencies and emergency response while imposing riders that limit perceived regulatory overreach, protect multiple‑use land access, and prioritize energy and economic activity.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Standard appropriations funding improves baseline prospects, but numerous contentious riders and legal-change provisions substantially reduce overall enactability.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • Senate cloture or filibuster dynamics on omnibus package
  • Extent of bipartisan willingness to accept the specific riders
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives highlight riders that weaken Endangered Species Act protections.

Standard appropriations funding improves baseline prospects, but numerous contentious riders and legal-change provisions substantially redu…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this is a conventionally drafted, comprehensive annual appropriations measure that supplies detailed funding levels, availability periods, and many legislative riders affecting…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis