H.R. 9327 (119th)Bill Overview

PEARL Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jun 18, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The PEARL Act requires the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the CBP Commissioner, to create a pilot program within 60 days to adopt dogs from local animal shelters and train them as support dogs for CBP’s Support Canine Program. The pilot will run for three years from establishment and then terminate.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes welfare, oversight, and community impact concerns

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly directs CBP to establish a time-limited pilot to adopt shelter dogs into its Support Canine Program and identifies responsible officials and deadlines.

The PEARL Act requires the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the CBP Commissioner, to create a pilot program within 60 days to adopt dogs from local animal shelters and train them as support dogs for CBP’s Support Canine Program.

The pilot will run for three years from establishment and then terminate.

The bill sets program scope and duration but does not specify funding, training standards, or evaluation metrics.

Passage35/100

Content is low-conflict and administratively simple, but absence of funding and legislative priority could delay or block enactment.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly directs CBP to establish a time-limited pilot to adopt shelter dogs into its Support Canine Program and identifies responsible officials and deadlines. The text is terse and provides only the most basic implementation markers without operational specifics, resourcing language, safeguards, or evaluation requirements.

Contention12/100

Left emphasizes welfare, oversight, and community impact concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay improve CBP personnel well-being through increased access to trained emotional support dogs.
  • Local governmentsCould increase animal shelter adoptions and reduce euthanasia rates locally.
  • Local governmentsMay generate positive community goodwill by partnering with local shelters.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAdds veterinary, training, and ongoing care expenses that Congress did not explicitly fund.
  • Potential burdenAdopted shelter dogs may have behavioral or health issues, increasing attrition during training.
  • Potential burdenPotential liability, safety, and accommodation issues could arise for officers and the public.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes welfare, oversight, and community impact concerns
Progressive70%

Generally favorable to mental-health supports and animal-adoption elements, but cautious about implementation details.

May question whether resources should go to CBP without clear oversight and welfare safeguards for the dogs and affected communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Likely supportive if the pilot is low-cost, has clear oversight, and yields measurable outcomes.

Views it as a modest, pragmatic program that can be evaluated within three years.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Generally supportive as a commonsense measure to support CBP personnel and promote pet adoption.

Will emphasize maintaining mission readiness and fiscal prudence during implementation.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Content is low-conflict and administratively simple, but absence of funding and legislative priority could delay or block enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No funding or appropriation language provided
  • Implementation details and training standards unspecified
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes welfare, oversight, and community impact concerns

Content is low-conflict and administratively simple, but absence of funding and legislative priority could delay or block enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly directs CBP to establish a time-limited pilot to adopt shelter dogs into its Support Canine Program and identifies responsible officials and deadlines. The…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis