H.R. 9364 (119th)Bill Overview

FAST Repairs for Wheelchairs Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jun 18, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The FAST Repairs for Wheelchairs Act would bar Medicare Advantage (MA) plans from requiring prior authorization, prescription, or medical documentation for repairs to defined complex rehabilitation technology (certain complex power and manual wheelchairs and related accessories). The prohibition applies to plan years beginning January 1 after enactment, while preserving prior authorization for initial medical necessity evaluations and for replacements due to loss, irreparable damage, end of useful life, or five years of use.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes access and equity for disabled beneficiaries

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly prohibits certain utilization controls by Medicare Advantage plans for repairs to complex rehabilitation technology and provides limited exceptions and a cross-referenced definition.

The FAST Repairs for Wheelchairs Act would bar Medicare Advantage (MA) plans from requiring prior authorization, prescription, or medical documentation for repairs to defined complex rehabilitation technology (certain complex power and manual wheelchairs and related accessories).

The prohibition applies to plan years beginning January 1 after enactment, while preserving prior authorization for initial medical necessity evaluations and for replacements due to loss, irreparable damage, end of useful life, or five years of use.

The definition of covered items references existing statutory definitions in section 1847(a)(2)(A).

Passage45/100

Technocratic, beneficiary-focused reform with likely bipartisan sympathy but countervailing insurer and budgetary concerns limit ease of enactment.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly prohibits certain utilization controls by Medicare Advantage plans for repairs to complex rehabilitation technology and provides limited exceptions and a cross-referenced definition.

Contention64/100

Liberal emphasizes access and equity for disabled beneficiaries

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFaster repairs and reduced wait times for wheelchair users, improving mobility and daily functioning.
  • Potential benefitLower administrative burden on beneficiaries and providers by removing prior authorization paperwork.
  • Potential benefitPotential reduction in health complications and emergency visits due to timely equipment repair.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMedicare Advantage plans may face higher repair expenditures, possibly affecting premiums or benefits.
  • Potential burdenRemoving prior authorization could raise improper claims or fraud risk without alternative oversight.
  • Potential burdenPlans lose a utilization-management tool, complicating cost-control and care-coordination practices.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes access and equity for disabled beneficiaries
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive.

The bill reduces administrative barriers that delay critical wheelchair repairs and aligns with disability access and equity priorities.

It preserves prior authorization for initial fittings and major replacements, focusing relief on repairs.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable.

The bill addresses a concrete administrative barrier and could improve outcomes, but raises legitimate cost, implementation, and fraud-prevention questions that require oversight.

Would seek cost estimates and metrics before full endorsement.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical.

While sympathetic to faster repairs for beneficiaries, this bill restricts MA plans' ability to manage care and control costs, representing federal encroachment on private plan flexibility.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technocratic, beneficiary-focused reform with likely bipartisan sympathy but countervailing insurer and budgetary concerns limit ease of enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost estimate provided
  • CMS position on operational impact unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes access and equity for disabled beneficiaries

Technocratic, beneficiary-focused reform with likely bipartisan sympathy but countervailing insurer and budgetary concerns limit ease of en…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly prohibits certain utilization controls by Medicare Advantage plans for repairs to complex rehabilitation technology and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis