Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
The bill amends the Help America Vote Act to require presentation of valid photo identification to receive a ballot in federal elections. It allows provisional ballots for in-person voters and a cure period of three days to present ID or a religious-objection affidavit.
Progressives emphasize potential voter suppression risks
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive change that amends HAVA to impose photo‑identification requirements for Federal elections and adds a grant program to assist States and Tribes in providing certain IDs.
The bill amends the Help America Vote Act to require presentation of valid photo identification to receive a ballot in federal elections.
It allows provisional ballots for in-person voters and a cure period of three days to present ID or a religious-objection affidavit.
Mail or other non‑in‑person ballots must include a photo ID copy or last four SSN plus an affidavit about inability to obtain ID.
Controversial nationwide voting restriction with modest offsets; plausible House passage but significant Senate and judicial obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive change that amends HAVA to impose photo‑identification requirements for Federal elections and adds a grant program to assist States and Tribes in providing certain IDs.
Progressives emphasize potential voter suppression risks
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize potential voter suppression risks
Likely skeptical and generally opposed; views the requirement as a barrier that disproportionately affects marginalized voters.
Recognizes mitigation steps like free IDs and public copying devices, but doubts sufficiency.
Concerned about the short three-day cure period and affidavit limits.
Mixed view: supports election integrity goals but worries about implementation and access.
Appreciates grant funding and public copying devices, yet questions whether funding and timelines are adequate.
Wants clear EAC guidance, careful rollout, and monitoring of turnout impacts.
Generally favorable; sees the bill as strengthening ballot integrity and public confidence in federal elections.
Views provisional ballots and cure process as providing access while preventing fraud.
Approves of grants to remove cost barriers but may seek firmer enforcement or wider EAC guidance authority.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Controversial nationwide voting restriction with modest offsets; plausible House passage but significant Senate and judicial obstacles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize potential voter suppression risks
Controversial nationwide voting restriction with modest offsets; plausible House passage but significant Senate and judicial obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive change that amends HAVA to impose photo‑identification requirements for Federal elections and adds a grant program to assist States a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.