Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Amends section 161B of the Atomic Energy Act to give the NRC Chairman authority to set annual basic pay for career appointees up to 110% of the SES maximum. The authority applies to current and future career appointees, must not affect NRC performance-appraisal certification, and requires reporting of how many career appointees receive adjusted pay.
Progressives emphasize public-safety staffing; conservatives emphasize fiscal and precedent concerns.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that clearly defines the legal authority to set pay for specified career appointees and integrates cleanly with existing statutes, but it provides limited procedural, fiscal, and oversight detail beyond minimal reporting adjustments.
Amends section 161B of the Atomic Energy Act to give the NRC Chairman authority to set annual basic pay for career appointees up to 110% of the SES maximum.
The authority applies to current and future career appointees, must not affect NRC performance-appraisal certification, and requires reporting of how many career appointees receive adjusted pay.
Also updates a GAO reporting reference in the ADVANCE Act to include the new subsection.
Limited, technical bill with modest fiscal impact and bipartisan appeal increases chances; potential political sensitivity over pay raises reduces certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that clearly defines the legal authority to set pay for specified career appointees and integrates cleanly with existing statutes, but it provides limited procedural, fiscal, and oversight detail beyond minimal reporting adjustments.
Progressives emphasize public-safety staffing; conservatives emphasize fiscal and precedent concerns.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize public-safety staffing; conservatives emphasize fiscal and precedent concerns.
Likely supportive if framed as strengthening the NRC's capacity to recruit and retain specialized, safety-critical staff.
Will want transparency, equity analysis, and protections against managerial favoritism before full endorsement.
Generally receptive if the change is narrowly targeted to address recruitment and retention problems at the NRC.
Will seek clear cost estimates, guardrails, and measurable outcomes before supporting implementation.
Skeptical about expanding pay authority for federal employees and concerned about precedent and taxpayer cost.
May accept narrowly if strictly limited, transparent, and justified by national security or critical skills shortages.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Limited, technical bill with modest fiscal impact and bipartisan appeal increases chances; potential political sensitivity over pay raises reduces certainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize public-safety staffing; conservatives emphasize fiscal and precedent concerns.
Limited, technical bill with modest fiscal impact and bipartisan appeal increases chances; potential political sensitivity over pay raises…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that clearly defines the legal authority to set pay for specified career appointees and integrates cleanly with existing s…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.