H.R. 9630 (119th)Bill Overview

BILL Drivers Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jul 9, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill directs the Energy Information Administration (EIA), with technical assistance from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), to produce a standardized, state-by-state analysis of the principal electricity cost components reflected in residential and small business retail bills over the previous seven years. The analysis must disaggregate costs (generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and State policy costs), consider regional reliability findings, assess large load impacts, use public data sources, publish consumer-friendly results, and submit a report to Congress within 180 days.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize equity, worry about misuse against clean energy

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-defined and procedurally-specific reporting requirement that assigns responsibility to the EIA, prescribes minimum analytic content, mandates interagency consultation, and requires public dissemination and a report to Congress within a set timeframe.

The bill directs the Energy Information Administration (EIA), with technical assistance from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), to produce a standardized, state-by-state analysis of the principal electricity cost components reflected in residential and small business retail bills over the previous seven years.

The analysis must disaggregate costs (generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and State policy costs), consider regional reliability findings, assess large load impacts, use public data sources, publish consumer-friendly results, and submit a report to Congress within 180 days.

The Act expressly does not change ratemaking authority or assign cost responsibility to utilities or customer classes.

Passage35/100

Content is narrow and noncontroversial so administratively plausible; passage depends on legislative vehicle and competing floor priorities.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-defined and procedurally-specific reporting requirement that assigns responsibility to the EIA, prescribes minimum analytic content, mandates interagency consultation, and requires public dissemination and a report to Congress within a set timeframe.

Contention45/100

Liberals emphasize equity, worry about misuse against clean energy

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StatesLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • StatesImproves transparency by breaking retail electricity bills into standardized, state-level cost components.
  • Potential benefitHelps policymakers target specific cost drivers such as taxes, transmission, or generation costs.
  • StatesAids businesses and customers in comparing state electricity cost structures for location and budgeting decisions.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAnalysis may be misinterpreted, leading to oversimplified conclusions about causality for bill increases.
  • Potential burdenEIA and FERC will incur administrative costs and staff time to conduct and publish analyses.
  • Local governmentsDistinguishing state, local, and federal policy costs may be technically difficult and produce contested allocations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize equity, worry about misuse against clean energy
Progressive75%

Generally supportive of greater transparency in utility bills, seeing the report as a tool to reveal cost drivers and target policy responses.

Concerned about framing and misuse of the analysis to attack clean energy or customer protections without context.

Wants attention to distributional impacts and low-income customer effects.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Mildly to strongly supportive as a pragmatic, informational measure that aids policymaking across jurisdictions.

Values the bill's use of existing data and FERC consultation, but will watch methodology, scope, and duplication risks.

Wants clear timelines and transparent methods.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Mixed but cautiously receptive if the analysis exposes state mandates and fees raising consumer costs.

Skeptical of new federal activity and possible bureaucratic costs.

Wants assurance the study is neutral and not a vehicle for more federal mandates.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Content is narrow and noncontroversial so administratively plausible; passage depends on legislative vehicle and competing floor priorities.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or appropriation language included
  • EIA resource capacity and timeline feasibility
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize equity, worry about misuse against clean energy

Content is narrow and noncontroversial so administratively plausible; passage depends on legislative vehicle and competing floor priorities.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-defined and procedurally-specific reporting requirement that assigns responsibility to the EIA, prescribes minimum analytic content, mandates interagency co…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis