H.R. 9983 (119th)Bill Overview

Lori Jackson-Nicolette Elias Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act

domestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jul 30, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill expands Federal prohibitions on firearm purchase and possession to people subject to certain domestic violence protection orders by defining a “covered domestic violence court order,” adding dating partners and similarly situated persons to the intimate-partner definition, and closing loopholes for ex parte orders. It requires courts to include firearm surrender orders, obligates prompt surrender or law enforcement removal and storage of firearms, revokes permits while orders are in effect, and creates a DOJ grant program to help States, tribes, and localities implement surrender, storage, and victim services.

Why people may split

Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is clearly targeted and legally detailed: it modifies core federal criminal statutes, supplies a precise new statutory definition for covered domestic violence orders, specifies operational surrender and removal procedures, and creates a grant program to support implementation by States, tribes, and localities.

The bill expands Federal prohibitions on firearm purchase and possession to people subject to certain domestic violence protection orders by defining a “covered domestic violence court order,” adding dating partners and similarly situated persons to the intimate-partner definition, and closing loopholes for ex parte orders.

It requires courts to include firearm surrender orders, obligates prompt surrender or law enforcement removal and storage of firearms, revokes permits while orders are in effect, and creates a DOJ grant program to help States, tribes, and localities implement surrender, storage, and victim services.

The bill also updates related NICS and statutory cross-references.

Passage40/100

Targeted survivor-focused reforms raise bipartisan sympathy but confront entrenched opposition on expanding firearm prohibitions and enforceable surrender rules; implementation costs and legal challenges add friction.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is clearly targeted and legally detailed: it modifies core federal criminal statutes, supplies a precise new statutory definition for covered domestic violence orders, specifies operational surrender and removal procedures, and creates a grant program to support implementation by States, tribes, and localities.

Contention70/100

Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesPermitting process

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesExpands federal firearms prohibition to dating partners, increasing individuals barred from purchasing or possessing fi…
  • Federal agenciesEstablishes a federal grant program to help states remove, store, and manage surrendered firearms.
  • Potential benefitRequires rapid surrender or removal of firearms, potentially reducing immediate risk to victims during dangerous period…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIncludes ex parte orders, raising concerns about restricting firearms before full adversarial hearings.
  • Potential burdenImposes rapid removal and storage duties that may strain law enforcement resources and budgets.
  • Permitting processRequires revocation of permits and background checks, creating administrative burdens for courts and agencies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive because the bill closes loopholes that leave survivors exposed and funds implementation.

It adopts measures the bill cites as linked to measurable reductions in intimate-partner homicides and builds victim-service partnerships.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally supportive of improving survivor safety while wary about due process and administrative feasibility.

Would favor the bill if it includes clear standards, adequate funding, and safeguards to prevent misuse and protect procedural rights.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Likely opposed or skeptical because the bill expands federal restrictions on firearms, raises due process concerns around ex parte orders, and mandates quick law enforcement seizure and permit revocations.

May support victim safety goals but view provisions as overbroad and constitutionally risky.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Targeted survivor-focused reforms raise bipartisan sympathy but confront entrenched opposition on expanding firearm prohibitions and enforceable surrender rules; implementation costs and legal challenges add friction.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absent formal cost estimate and appropriation levels
  • Extent of bipartisan support among federal legislators
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)

Targeted survivor-focused reforms raise bipartisan sympathy but confront entrenched opposition on expanding firearm prohibitions and enforc…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is clearly targeted and legally detailed: it modifies core federal criminal statutes, supplies a precise new statutory definition…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis