- Federal agenciesExpands federal firearms prohibition to dating partners, increasing individuals barred from purchasing or possessing fi…
- Federal agenciesEstablishes a federal grant program to help states remove, store, and manage surrendered firearms.
- Potential benefitRequires rapid surrender or removal of firearms, potentially reducing immediate risk to victims during dangerous period…
Lori Jackson-Nicolette Elias Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill expands Federal prohibitions on firearm purchase and possession to people subject to certain domestic violence protection orders by defining a “covered domestic violence court order,” adding dating partners and similarly situated persons to the intimate-partner definition, and closing loopholes for ex parte orders. It requires courts to include firearm surrender orders, obligates prompt surrender or law enforcement removal and storage of firearms, revokes permits while orders are in effect, and creates a DOJ grant program to help States, tribes, and localities implement surrender, storage, and victim services.
Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is clearly targeted and legally detailed: it modifies core federal criminal statutes, supplies a precise new statutory definition for covered domestic violence orders, specifies operational surrender and removal procedures, and creates a grant program to support implementation by States, tribes, and localities.
The bill expands Federal prohibitions on firearm purchase and possession to people subject to certain domestic violence protection orders by defining a “covered domestic violence court order,” adding dating partners and similarly situated persons to the intimate-partner definition, and closing loopholes for ex parte orders.
It requires courts to include firearm surrender orders, obligates prompt surrender or law enforcement removal and storage of firearms, revokes permits while orders are in effect, and creates a DOJ grant program to help States, tribes, and localities implement surrender, storage, and victim services.
The bill also updates related NICS and statutory cross-references.
Targeted survivor-focused reforms raise bipartisan sympathy but confront entrenched opposition on expanding firearm prohibitions and enforceable surrender rules; implementation costs and legal challenges add friction.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is clearly targeted and legally detailed: it modifies core federal criminal statutes, supplies a precise new statutory definition for covered domestic violence orders, specifies operational surrender and removal procedures, and creates a grant program to support implementation by States, tribes, and localities.
Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenIncludes ex parte orders, raising concerns about restricting firearms before full adversarial hearings.
- Potential burdenImposes rapid removal and storage duties that may strain law enforcement resources and budgets.
- Permitting processRequires revocation of permits and background checks, creating administrative burdens for courts and agencies.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)
Likely strongly supportive because the bill closes loopholes that leave survivors exposed and funds implementation.
It adopts measures the bill cites as linked to measurable reductions in intimate-partner homicides and builds victim-service partnerships.
Generally supportive of improving survivor safety while wary about due process and administrative feasibility.
Would favor the bill if it includes clear standards, adequate funding, and safeguards to prevent misuse and protect procedural rights.
Likely opposed or skeptical because the bill expands federal restrictions on firearms, raises due process concerns around ex parte orders, and mandates quick law enforcement seizure and permit revocations.
May support victim safety goals but view provisions as overbroad and constitutionally risky.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted survivor-focused reforms raise bipartisan sympathy but confront entrenched opposition on expanding firearm prohibitions and enforceable surrender rules; implementation costs and legal challenges add friction.
- Absent formal cost estimate and appropriation levels
- Extent of bipartisan support among federal legislators
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Victim safety and reduced homicides (liberal) vs. due-process concerns (conservative)
Targeted survivor-focused reforms raise bipartisan sympathy but confront entrenched opposition on expanding firearm prohibitions and enforc…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy change that is clearly targeted and legally detailed: it modifies core federal criminal statutes, supplies a precise new statutory definition…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.