Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…
Authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Forest Service, to enter cooperative agreements with governors, local governments, territories, and federally recognized tribes to detect, treat, and mitigate mountain pine beetle infestations on lands under their jurisdictions. Agreements may cover monitoring and data sharing, joint planning, increased processing capacity for beetle-killed trees, hazard reduction, and other wildfire-risk reduction activities.
Liberals worry salvage logging and ecological harm; conservatives emphasize timber utilization.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly authorizes administrative action (cooperative agreements and interagency technical assistance) to address mountain pine beetle infestations and associated wildfire risk.
Authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Forest Service, to enter cooperative agreements with governors, local governments, territories, and federally recognized tribes to detect, treat, and mitigate mountain pine beetle infestations on lands under their jurisdictions.
Agreements may cover monitoring and data sharing, joint planning, increased processing capacity for beetle-killed trees, hazard reduction, and other wildfire-risk reduction activities.
The Administrator of APHIS must provide technical assistance on detection, spread dynamics, and mitigation upon request.
Technocratic, narrow measure with limited fiscal impact and clear beneficiaries; likelihood hinges on committee prioritization and inclusion in broader legislative vehicles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly authorizes administrative action (cooperative agreements and interagency technical assistance) to address mountain pine beetle infestations and associated wildfire risk. It identifies responsible officials and enumerates types of permissible activities, but it omits several elements commonly expected for operational authorities—most notably funding provisions, procedural rules, detailed integration with existing law, edge‑case protections, and accountability/reporting requirements.
Liberals worry salvage logging and ecological harm; conservatives emphasize timber utilization.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals worry salvage logging and ecological harm; conservatives emphasize timber utilization.
Generally supportive of coordinated action to reduce beetle-driven forest loss and wildfire risk, but cautious about methods.
Would stress environmental safeguards, protection of ecosystems, and meaningful tribal and community consultation.
May push for explicit language on NEPA compliance and limits on commercial salvage practices.
Views the bill as a practical, administratively light way to improve intergovernmental response to a clear forest health problem.
Appreciates technical assistance provision and state-tribal inclusion, while noting the need for clear funding, measurable goals, and oversight.
Would seek modest amendments for accountability and cost transparency.
Likely supportive because it enables state and local partners, enhances forest-product processing, and addresses wildfire risk from beetle outbreaks.
Prefers local control and quicker operational responses rather than new federal programs.
May press for streamlined approvals and stronger use of timber utilization markets.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, narrow measure with limited fiscal impact and clear beneficiaries; likelihood hinges on committee prioritization and inclusion in broader legislative vehicles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals worry salvage logging and ecological harm; conservatives emphasize timber utilization.
Technocratic, narrow measure with limited fiscal impact and clear beneficiaries; likelihood hinges on committee prioritization and inclusio…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly authorizes administrative action (cooperative agreements and interagency technical assistance) to address mountain pine beetle infestations and a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.