H. Res. 1019 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the roles and the contributions of America's Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their critical role in providing quality health care for the public…

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jan 23, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

A non‑binding House resolution thanking and promoting Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), noting their history, scope of practice, and role in rural and military care.

It cites statistics (about 69,000 CRNAs, roughly 58.5 million anesthetics annually) and designates January 18–24, 2026 as National CRNA Week.

The resolution encourages patients, administrators, clinicians, and policymakers to recognize CRNAs and utilize them to their full potential.

Passage0/100

This is a House simple resolution (ceremonial) that does not create binding law or require presidential signature; it is not the type of measure that becomes law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose, names the relevant week and audiences, and encourages recognition without creating legal obligations, funding changes, or implementation requirements.

Contention15/100

Progressive wants follow‑up policy on staffing, pay, and equity.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
EmployersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • EmployersRaises public awareness of CRNA roles, potentially increasing patient and employer recognition.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay support recruitment and retention by publicly endorsing the profession.
  • Targeted stakeholdersEncouraging CRNA utilization could improve anesthesia access in rural and medically underserved areas.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCritics may say the resolution could be used to advocate scope expansions without new safeguards.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSome may argue it implicitly endorses replacing anesthesiologist-led care in certain settings.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAs a symbolic measure, it may divert attention from substantive legislation on training or safety.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants follow‑up policy on staffing, pay, and equity.
Progressive90%

Generally supportive of honoring CRNAs for expanding access, especially in rural and underserved communities.

Views the resolution as a useful spotlight but insufficient without policy on pay equity, workforce diversity, and access.

Would like follow-up legislation linking recognition to concrete protections and investments.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Views the resolution as a low‑stakes, bipartisan recognition of an important health workforce.

Supports the awareness goal and rural access emphasis while noting it creates no policy obligations.

Prefers follow‑up data‑driven workforce planning rather than symbolic gestures alone.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive of honoring CRNAs, especially for rural access and military service, while cautious about implications.

Supports leveraging non‑physician providers to improve access but resists federal overreach into professional scope decisions.

Prefers state control and opposes implied mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a House simple resolution (ceremonial) that does not create binding law or require presidential signature; it is not the type of measure that becomes law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration quickly
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants follow‑up policy on staffing, pay, and equity.

This is a House simple resolution (ceremonial) that does not create binding law or require presidential signature; it is not the type of me…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose, names the relevant week and audiences, and encourages recognition without creating lega…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis