- Targeted stakeholdersProvides formal congressional recognition that may raise public awareness of Scouting America's programs and anniversar…
- CommunitiesMay encourage volunteer recruitment and youth enrollment, potentially increasing community service and nonprofit capaci…
- Local governmentsAffirms volunteers and Eagle Scouts, which could boost local fundraising and volunteer retention for scouting units.
Supporting the designation of "Scouting America Day" in celebration of its 116th anniversary.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This House resolution supports designating February 8, 2026, as “Scouting America Day” honoring the 116th anniversary of the organization (formerly Boy Scouts of America).
The text lists historical facts, membership and volunteer statistics, the organization’s purposes (including religious and civic aims), and its partnership with America 250.
The resolution is ceremonial and does not create binding policy or funding obligations.
As a House resolution of purely symbolic nature, it does not create law; passage in the House is likely but 'becoming law' is unlikely absent separate Senate action or different vehicle.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it sets out historical context and expresses support for designating 'Scouting America Day' to mark the 116th anniversary, and it requires little additional statutory scaffolding.
Progressives stress concerns about religious language and inclusivity.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersIs largely symbolic and creates no enforceable policy, funding, or programmatic changes for Scouting America.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay be seen as congressional endorsement of a private organization that references religiously based values.
- Targeted stakeholdersCould draw criticism from those concerned about the organization's past membership or inclusion controversies.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives stress concerns about religious language and inclusivity.
Likely mixed.
The persona values youth development, service, and civic education praised in the resolution.
However, it will note the resolution’s explicit reference to "religious and spiritual concepts" and may recall Scouting’s historical controversies, creating reservations about unconditional endorsement.
Generally supportive but pragmatic.
The persona will view the resolution as a nonbinding, positive recognition of volunteerism and youth leadership while seeking reassurance that the designation is nonpartisan and inclusive.
They will treat the measure as symbolic with low fiscal or policy consequence.
Likely strongly supportive.
The persona will welcome recognition of patriotism, service, and traditional civic virtues emphasized in the resolution.
The religious and spiritual language aligns with conservative priorities around faith-based community involvement.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House resolution of purely symbolic nature, it does not create law; passage in the House is likely but 'becoming law' is unlikely absent separate Senate action or different vehicle.
- Whether the House will schedule floor consideration
- Whether a Senate companion resolution will be introduced
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives stress concerns about religious language and inclusivity.
As a House resolution of purely symbolic nature, it does not create law; passage in the House is likely but 'becoming law' is unlikely abse…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it sets out historical context and expresses support for designating 'Scouting America Day' to mark the 116th…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.